Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808797›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2026

Value of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision in the treatment of non-malignant breast nodules diagnosed as BI-RADS 4A or higher by ultrasound.

Yang Sun, Yunfei Liu, Ligang Cui, Yutao Lei, Hongmei Zhao, Ping He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yang Sun *Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yunfei Liu *Department of Ultrasound, Pu'er People's Hospital, Pu'er, China.
Ligang CuiDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yutao LeiDepartment of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hongmei ZhaoDepartment of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ping HeDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In clinical practice, decision-making for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4A breast nodules poses significant challenges. Although 2-10% of such nodules are malignant, the majority are benign or high-risk lesions. Conventional management strategies-ranging from short-term imaging follow-up to open surgical excision (SE)-are associated with limitations: the former increases psychological burden and risk of loss to follow-up, while the latter entails trauma, cost, and aesthetic concerns. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision (VAE), as a minimally invasive technique, enables both diagnosis and treatment. Compared with core needle biopsy (CNB), VAE achieves more complete removal; compared with open surgery, it is less traumatic, allows faster recovery, and yields better cosmetic outcomes. Nevertheless, the precise clinical value of VAE in managing nodules initially assessed as BI-RADS 4A or higher but pathologically confirmed as non-malignant remains inadequately defined. In particular, robust evidence regarding its complete excision rate, long-term local recurrence rate, and risk of malignant transformation is lacking, contributing to variability in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided VAE in treating non-malignant breast nodules diagnosed as BI-RADS 4A or higher by ultrasound, and to assess the rates of recurrence and malignant transformation post-VAE. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 262 patients diagnosed with non-malignant breast nodules classified as BI-RADS 4A or higher by ultrasound who underwent VAE between January 2014 and December 2022. Post-VAE follow-up was performed to observe the rates of nodule recurrence and malignant transformation. Results: Among the 262 patients, 10 experienced recurrence post-VAE, resulting in a local recurrence rate of 3.8%. Of these, 3 cases were benign phyllodes tumors, and 7 were intraductal papillomas. One patient developed malignant transformation post-VAE, yielding a malignant transformation rate of 0.4%. The patient underwent VAE surgery and the pathological findings suggested breast adenosis. The overall rate of recurrence and malignant transformation was 4.2%. No statistically significant differences were observed between the recurrence/malignant transformation group and the non-recurrence/non-malignant transformation group in terms of age, distance of the nodule from the nipple or BI-RADS classification (P<0.05). Conclusions: VAE is an effective treatment for non-malignant breast nodules diagnosed as BI-RADS 4A or higher by ultrasound, with a low rate of recurrence and malignant transformation, indicating a certain level of safety. However, we recommend regular follow-up after VAE, with follow-up conducted every two years, and any suspicious lesions detected during follow-up should be actively diagnosed and treated.

Indexed as

breastBreast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)malignant transformationrecurrenceVacuum-assisted excision (VAE)

Identifiers

PMID41808797
PMCPMC12968865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.