ReviewThe Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society2025
The process of rapid sequence intubation in the prehospital setting: A scoping review.
Review in The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ensuring that the patient's airway is secured is one of the essential priorities for emergency care providers in the prehospital setting. Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) intervention allows the administration of induction and paralytic medications that optimise the conditions for insertion of the endotracheal tube. RSI is essential in the management of critically ill patients to address the risks of aspiration of gastric contents and morbidity and premature mortality. Objectives: To systematically explore, map, describe, and provide the extent and nature of published research of the most up-to-date evidence-based elements and guidance of RSI in the prehospital setting. Methods: This scoping review followed a framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and refined by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The following databases were utilised to guide the literature searching process across multiple resources: Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed engines. The articles included were full-text publications written in English, published between 2000 and 2023. A search strategy incorporating different combinations of keywords was developed with the assistance of a librarian. A population, context and concepts (PCC) framework was used to guide the inclusion criteria of identified articles. The selected titles and full-text articles were screened on Rayyan software (Rayyan, USA) and presented on the PRISMA flow diagram. Data were extracted and displayed on an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corp, USA). Concepts were identified, categorised, and grouped into themes through thematic analysis. Results: A total of 2 585 titles and abstracts were screened after duplicates had been removed. Only 138 full-text articles were screened, and 40 articles met eligibility criteria. Categories that were formed from concepts identified were grouped into seven themes, which included: RSI preparations, RSI procedure, training, system requirements, clinical governance, standardisation of RSI, and potential adverse events (AEs) associated with prehospital RSI (PRSI). Conclusion: The seven themes generated from this review indicate that safe, effective, and successful PRSI is achievable, with success and complication rates comparable to, or better than, those in in-hospital settings. The findings underscore that PRSI is a complex intervention that must be performed by appropriately trained personnel. Furthermore, the review highlights the importance of using a well-practised checklist approach and implementing a robust clinical governance framework to minimise AEs, support continuous quality improvement, enhance patient safety, and ultimately improve clinical outcomes. Contribution of the study: This scoping review contributes to the existing body of knowledge by synthesising the current best evidence on rapid sequence intubation in the prehospital setting. The study highlights key trends, best practices and gaps, providing valuable insights to guide clinical practice, inform training protocol, and support future research aimed at improving patient outcomes during prehospital airway management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.