ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2026
Assessing the knowledge, practices and collaborative readiness of community pharmacists' management of progressive joint disorders in South Africa.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Progressive joint disorders (PJDs) are a leading cause of chronic pain and disability, requiring multidisciplinary management. Community pharmacists are well positioned to support patients through education, medication management and referrals, yet gaps in referral practices and interprofessional collaboration persist. Aim: To assess South African community pharmacists' referral practices in managing PJDs and their knowledge of other healthcare providers' roles, with the goal of identifying opportunities to enhance collaboration and inform the development of referral guidelines. Setting: Private community pharmacies across South Africa. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured online questionnaire distributed nationally. Data on demographics, familiarity with PJDs, management practices, referral behaviours and barriers to collaboration were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Of 373 participants, 84.5% were familiar with PJDs, most commonly gout, osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Over 60% did not use formal guidelines for PJD management. There was no significant association between guideline use and familiarity with other providers' roles ( Conclusion: Pharmacists play a pivotal role in PJD management and require better training, awareness and structured referral pathways to enhance multidisciplinary care and optimise patient outcomes. Contribution: This study highlights the need for evidence-based referral guidelines and interprofessional education in pharmacy curricula to strengthen pharmacists' role in multidisciplinary PJD care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.