Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808741›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025

Early detection of chronic kidney disease using deep learning: a Mini review.

Md Jakir Hossen, Hasanul Bannah, Ridwan Jamal Sadib

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Md Jakir HossenCenter for Advanced Analytics (CAA), COE for Artificial Intelligence Faculty of Engineering & Technology (FET), Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia.
Hasanul BannahFaculty of AI and Engineering, Multimedia University Cyberjaya, Cyberjaya, Malaysia.
Ridwan Jamal SadibDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, American International University-Bangladesh (AIUB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) remains a major contributor to global morbidity, often progressing unnoticed until advanced stages when treatment options become limited and costly. Recent advances in deep learning have reshaped early CKD assessment by enabling the analysis of complex imaging, clinical, and longitudinal laboratory datasets. This mini-review synthesizes findings from studies published between 2020 and 2025, highlighting models that report diagnostic accuracies ranging from 88% to 99.96%, AUC values reaching 0.93, and ensemble architectures capable of forecasting CKD 6 to12 months before clinical diagnosis with up to 99.31% accuracy. These systems spanning Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTMs), hybrid CNN-LSTM designs, and transfer-learning frameworks have demonstrated clear advantages over conventional diagnostic markers such as serum creatinine and eGFR. Despite impressive numerical performance, key limitations persist: class imbalance in early-stage CKD, restricted generalizability due to single-centre datasets, variability in imaging quality, and the limited interpretability of high-capacity neural networks. As deep learning continues to advance, robust external validation, transparent model explanations, and multi-institutional datasets will be essential to support safe and reliable clinical integration.

Indexed as

chronic kidney disease (CKD)convolutional neural networks (CNN)deep learning (DL)explainable AI (XAI)long short-term memory networks (LSTM)

Identifiers

PMID41808741
PMCPMC12968004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.