Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808712›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2026

A radiomics-based nomogram for preoperatively predicting the invasiveness of nodular lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.

Xiaocui Liu, Xiuying Yang, Xiaofei Yue, Bo Sun, Jiayun Liu, Guilin Zhang, Jing Li, Chuansheng Zheng, Xuefeng Kan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaocui Liu *Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiuying Yang *Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaofei YueDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Bo SunDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jiayun LiuDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Guilin ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Chuansheng ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xuefeng KanDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Thoracic Tumors published in 2021, lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) includes minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). The invasive component of MIA is ≤5 mm, while IAC is, on the contrary. This difference in the extent of invasion leads to distinct biological behaviors, which correspond to different treatment approaches and prognostic outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to construct and validate a radiomics-based nomogram for preoperatively predicting the invasiveness of LUAD appearing as pulmonary nodules. Methods: From January 2020 to June 2024, data of a total of 611 pulmonary nodule patients who underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT) examinations at three centers were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were pathologically diagnosed with LUAD, including IAC and MIA. Individuals from the primary center were randomly divided into a training cohort and an internal validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3, while patients from the other two centers were included in an external validation cohort. Firstly, univariable and multivariable logistic regression (LR) analyses were performed to develop a clinical model. Secondly, three representative machine learning classifiers were used to construct radiomics models, and their performances were compared to select the optimal one. Finally, with the integration of the clinical and radiomics signatures, a combined model was established, and a nomogram was generated to visualize the risk scores. The diagnostic performance was evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the goodness-of-fit was verified through the calibration curves, and the clinical utility was assessed by the decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Six hundred and eleven patients were recruited, with 356 individuals in the training cohort (IAC, 227; MIA, 129), 153 in the validation cohort (IAC, 108; MIA, 45), and 102 in the test cohort (IAC, 70; MIA, 32). The combined model worked robustly and effectively, with areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.968 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.953-0.984], 0.902 (95% CI, 0.856-0.949), and 0.899 (95% CI, 0.839-0.959) in the training, validation, and test cohorts, respectively, demonstrating an excellent predictive power, a good model fit, and a significant clinical utility. Conclusions: This radiomics-based nomogram could serve as a clinical predictive model for preoperatively predicting the invasiveness of LUAD, which contributes to the future development of more individualized therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Computed tomography (CT)lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD)machine learningpulmonary noduleradiomics

Identifiers

PMID41808712
PMCPMC12969169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.