ArticleCureus2026
Safety and Tolerability of Edoxaban in Filipino Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Post-marketing Surveillance Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant driver of cardiovascular mortality and stroke. While the safety and efficacy of the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) edoxaban are well-established in global trials, there is limited real-world evidence within the Filipino population. This study evaluated the safety and bleeding rates of edoxaban in routine clinical practice among Filipino patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The safety profile of edoxaban is of particular interest in the context of the "East Asian Paradox", where Asian patients exhibit a higher risk of bleeding complications on traditional anticoagulants compared to Western populations.
methodsThis was a multicenter, prospective, observational post-marketing surveillance study conducted at six sites in the Philippines, namely, Davao Doctors Hospital, St. Luke's Medical Center (Quezon City and Global City), Makati Medical Center, the Philippine General Hospital, and the Philippine Heart Center, between March 2022 and December 2024. Adult patients (≥21 years) with NVAF and a CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years (doubled), diabetes mellitus, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA)/thromboembolism (doubled), vascular disease, age 65-74 years, and sex category (female)) score of ≥1 were prescribed edoxaban (30 mg or 60 mg daily) at the clinician's discretion. Patients were followed for 180 days. The primary endpoints were adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and major bleeding.
resultsA total of 72 patients were enrolled; however, one patient (1.4%) did not receive the treatment and was excluded, resulting in a safety analysis population of 71 (mean age: 68.5±10.1 years). The majority of participants were female (50.7%; n=36). Comorbidities were highly prevalent, including hypertension (100%; n=71), coronary artery disease (25.4%; n=18), and heart failure (23.9%; n=17). In this cohort, 35.2% (n=25) were prescribed the 30 mg dose, while 64.8% (n=46) received the 60 mg dose. Over the 180-day observation period, no major bleeding, as well as bleeding requiring medical intervention but not meeting the major criteria, occurred (0%; 95% CI: 0-4.2%). The overall incidence of AEs was low (7%; n=5). One fatal serious AE (acute myocardial infarction) was reported but was determined to be unrelated to the study drug.
conclusionIn this real-world Filipino cohort, edoxaban demonstrated a favorable safety profile with zero major bleeding events over six months of therapy. Despite a high-risk profile and significant comorbidities, these findings align with global phase III and post-marketing data, supporting edoxaban as a safe anticoagulation option for Filipino patients with NVAF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.