Understanding memory dynamics in stroke patients: Learning and forgetting patterns based on verbal recall.

Selma Lugtmeijer, Edward H F de Haan, Roy P C Kessels

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuropsychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Selma LugtmeijerCentre for Human Brain Health and Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4864-7391

Edward H F de HaanDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0312-3674

Roy P C KesselsDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9500-9793

Funding

European Research Council 339374

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory deficits are common post stroke. Most episodic memory tests consist of a learning phase, immediate recall and a 30-min delayed recall test. Recent research suggests a proportion of stroke patients exhibit accelerated long-term forgetting after a longer delay. Based on a word-list learning test in stroke patients and controls, we demonstrate that stroke patients recalled fewer words after five learning trials, and on 30-min and 1-week delayed recall tests, caused by shallower learning curves and higher percentages of forgetting.

Indexed as

Memory DisordersMental RecallStrokeVerbal LearningAgedFemaleHumansMaleMemory, EpisodicMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsTime Factorsaccelerated long‐term forgettingepisodic memoryforgettinglearninglong‐term memorystrokeverbal memory

Identifiers

PMID41808613

DOI10.1111/jnp.70004

PMCPMC12976844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.