ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026
Assessment of Meat Handlers' Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Meat Safety in Retail Meat Shops.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFoodborne diseases (FBDs) affect nearly 600 million people annually worldwide, with contaminated meat representing a major source of illness. In developing countries such as Ethiopia, inadequate meat hygiene, poor handling practices and limited regulatory enforcement increase the risk of contamination. Meat handlers play a critical role in preventing foodborne pathogens, yet gaps in knowledge, training and personal hygiene practices remain significant public health concerns.
objectivesTo assess knowledge, attitude and practices (KAPs) towards meat safety among meat handlers in meat retail shops in Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia, and to determine the association of risk factors to meat safety.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 182 randomly selected meat handlers. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews using a questionnaire, and participants were selected via simple random sampling. Descriptive statistics summarized socio-demographic characteristics and KAP levels. Chi-square tests examined associations between independent variables and KAP scores. On the basis of Bloom's taxonomy, scores ≥70% were classified as good.
resultsOf the participants, 75.82% were male, 40.11% had at least secondary education, and 51.65% had received meat safety training. Good knowledge (88.46%), positive attitudes (92.31%) and good practices (71.98%) were observed. Knowledge, attitudes and practices were significantly associated with education and work experience (p < 0.05).
conclusionsAlthough meat handlers demonstrated generally good KAP towards meat safety, targeted training, consistent personal protective equipment (PPE) use, and regular medical check-ups are essential to reduce contamination risks and improve public health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.