ArticleHistology and histopathology2026
Artificial intelligence for detection, grading, and prognostication in prostate cancer pathology: A scoping review.
Article in Histology and histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been transforming many aspects of medical care. In prostate cancer, ongoing progress in AI has improved research and patient care. Recent advances in machine learning and deep learning have produced tools that help diagnose cancer, assess risk, and predict outcomes. In screening, AI-based risk calculators improve detection and help avoid unnecessary biopsies. Deep learning algorithms, particularly convolutional neural networks, have demonstrated expert-level performance in pathology, identifying malignancy and assigning Gleason grades with high accuracy. These tools also streamline workflow, flagging challenging cases for review and quantifying prognostic markers, such as Ki-67 and cribriform patterns. In addition, AI-based models can predict molecular alterations, microsatellite instability, and lymph node metastasis directly from histology images, providing cost-effective alternatives to traditional assays. The development of multimodal models integrates digital pathology and clinical parameters, enabling personalized treatment recommendations and improved outcome prediction. Natural language processing and large language models further expand AI's potential, facilitating information extraction from clinical notes and enhancing patient education. Despite these advances, most studies remain retrospective with heterogeneous endpoints. Performance often drops when models are tested at new sites because of differences in patient populations and slide preparation. Access to large, well-annotated datasets is limited, and technical variation hampers reproducibility. To move toward clinical use, the field needs prospective, multicenter validation, preanalytical and analytical standardization, and clear reporting of failure modes and human oversight. Emerging approaches, including self-supervised pretraining, transformer-based image models, and language-vision systems, are likely to improve generalization and support more personalized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41808601What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.