ReviewCancer2026
Review of patient-reported outcomes in EMPOWER-Lung 1 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with cemiplimab versus chemotherapy.
Review in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03088540 (A Global, Randomised, Phase 3, Open-label Study of REGN2810), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Global, Randomised, Phase 3, Open-label Study of REGN2810 (ANTI-PD 1 Antibody) Versus Platinum Based Chemotherapy in First Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced or Metastatic PD L1+Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between prognostic nutritional index and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) for cemiplimab monotherapy versus chemotherapy from the EMPOWER-Lung 1 phase 3 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03088540) in patients who had advanced non-small cell lung cancer with programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression ≥50% were previously reported.
methodsThis review article characterizes PRO findings for cemiplimab monotherapy versus chemotherapy overall and in prespecified subgroups of patients from the EMPOWER-Lung 1 clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks or platinum-doublet chemotherapy, and multiple PROs, including the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Core 30 questionnaire, were administered in the EMPOWER-Lung 1 trial. PRO analyses using mixed model for repeated measures analysis to estimate least-squares mean changes in PRO scores from baseline and Cox proportional hazards models for the time to deterioration using a 10-point threshold have been reported and are summarized herein.
resultsGenerally, the mixed model for repeated measures analysis of global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) significantly favored cemiplimab versus chemotherapy in the overall study population and in prespecified subgroup populations. Statistically significant differences in the overall change from baseline in GHS/QoL favoring cemiplimab versus chemotherapy were observed overall and in multiple subgroups, including patients who had brain metastasis (p = .0110), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 (p = .0017), squamous (p = .0247) and nonsquamous (p = .0073) histology, and patients aged 65 years and older (p = .0069). Statistically significant delays in the time to deterioration favoring cemiplimab were observed in GHS/QoL for the subgroup with programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression ≥90% (p = .0152) and the subgroup younger than 65 years (p = .0195).
conclusionsCollectively, the current data support the GHS/QoL benefit of first-line cemiplimab monotherapy versus chemotherapy overall and in multiple subpopulations of patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression ≥50% advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.