ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
In the tracks of a whale: inferring size class, orientation and swimming speed from thermal flukeprints.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite decades of innovation, monitoring whales remains constrained by their brief surfacings, wide-ranging movements and limitations of conventional survey methods. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and thermal infrared (TIR) sensors offer non-invasive alternatives, yet most applications rely on short-lived direct detections. Here, we evaluated a novel approach using UAV-based TIR imaging to extract biological and behavioural information from thermal flukeprints, surface disturbances generated by whale tailbeats. Field surveys of free-ranging humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) off Reunion Island demonstrated that flukeprint width robustly distinguished calves from adults. Flukeprint spacing provided swimming-speed estimates consistent with RGB-based measurements (mean error 0.42 m s-1; median relative error 16%), while flukeprint-derived orientations aligned closely with visual headings (mean offset -3.1 deg). These results indicate thermal flukeprints capture age class, movement and directional information even when animals are partially visible or submerged. By extending observations beyond direct sightings, TIR-detected flukeprints offer a low-impact, complementary tool for cetacean monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.