Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808553›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

In the tracks of a whale: inferring size class, orientation and swimming speed from thermal flukeprints.

Lucie Laporte-Devylder, Henrik Skov Midtiby, Magnus Wahlberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucie Laporte-DevylderDepartment of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0406-0839
Henrik Skov MidtibyUAS Center, Maersk McKinney Møller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3310-5680
Magnus WahlbergDepartment of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8239-5485

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE 101071224HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 101071224University of Southern Denmark
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite decades of innovation, monitoring whales remains constrained by their brief surfacings, wide-ranging movements and limitations of conventional survey methods. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and thermal infrared (TIR) sensors offer non-invasive alternatives, yet most applications rely on short-lived direct detections. Here, we evaluated a novel approach using UAV-based TIR imaging to extract biological and behavioural information from thermal flukeprints, surface disturbances generated by whale tailbeats. Field surveys of free-ranging humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) off Reunion Island demonstrated that flukeprint width robustly distinguished calves from adults. Flukeprint spacing provided swimming-speed estimates consistent with RGB-based measurements (mean error 0.42 m s-1; median relative error 16%), while flukeprint-derived orientations aligned closely with visual headings (mean offset -3.1 deg). These results indicate thermal flukeprints capture age class, movement and directional information even when animals are partially visible or submerged. By extending observations beyond direct sightings, TIR-detected flukeprints offer a low-impact, complementary tool for cetacean monitoring.

Indexed as

Humpback WhaleOrientationSwimmingAnimalsBody SizeUnmanned Aerial DevicesCetacean conservationDroneFlukeprintsNon-invasive monitoringThermal infrared imaging

Identifiers

PMID41808553
PMCPMC13120677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.