Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808465›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2026

Investigation of Plant Growth Promotion Potential of Novel Compost-Derived Bacilli and Anticipating Their In Vivo Effectiveness Through Mathematical Modelling.

Debapriya Maitra, Bedaprana Roy, Bikram Dhara, Archisman Chakraborti, Indranath Chaudhuri, Ranadhir Chakraborty, Sudeshna Shyam Choudhury, Swastika Maitra, Ajoy Kumer, Arup Kumar Mitra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Debapriya MaitraDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Engineering and Management, Kolkata, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0638-8574
Bedaprana RoyDepartment of Microbiology, St. Xavier's College (Autonomous), Kolkata, India.
Bikram DharaDepartment of Microbiology, St. Xavier's College (Autonomous), Kolkata, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5433-1994
Archisman ChakrabortiDepartment of Physics, St. Xavier's College (Autonomous), Kolkata, India.
Indranath ChaudhuriDepartment of Physics, St. Xavier's College (Autonomous), Kolkata, India.
Ranadhir ChakrabortyDepartment of Biotechnology, University of North Bengal, Siliguri, West Bengal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8299-8358
Sudeshna Shyam ChoudhuryDepartment of Microbiology, St. Xavier's College (Autonomous), Kolkata, India.
Swastika MaitraCenter for Global Health Research, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.
Ajoy KumerDepartment of Chemistry, IUBAT-International University of Business Agriculture & Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5136-6166
Arup Kumar MitraDepartment of Microbiology, St. Xavier's College (Autonomous), Kolkata, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8983-6960

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India BT/INF/22/SP41296/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns about the unintended consequences of using pesticides in agricultural settings have led to a shift in practise towards more environmentally friendly methods such as composting, manuring and using plant growth-promoting bacteria. While compost is known for its ability to promote plant growth and serve as a soil amendment, little is known about the various types of bacteria that can be found in it and how effective they are in sustainable agriculture. This study was designed to assess the potency of a few common isolates from local compost by quantifying their capacity to fix nutrients, produce growth hormone, mitigate abiotic stress, produce lignocellulose-degrading enzyme and produce soil-amending enzyme, all while scaling them using an objective in silico method. In addition, the isolates were tested in the field against test crops selected from the monocot and dicot families, namely maize (Zea mays) and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). When comparing the treated settings to the untreated control setups, an increase was seen in the quantity of fruits (okra) and percentage of grain filling (maize). By creating a score system, an attempt was made to compare the efficiency of five strains based on the in vitro and in vivo experiments.

Indexed as

BacillusCompostingPlant DevelopmentSoil MicrobiologyModels, TheoreticalPlant Growth RegulatorsSoilZea maysPlant Growth RegulatorsSoilBacilluscompostnutrient fixationplant growth promoting bacteriasustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID41808465
PMCPMC12976457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.