ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2026
Investigation of Plant Growth Promotion Potential of Novel Compost-Derived Bacilli and Anticipating Their In Vivo Effectiveness Through Mathematical Modelling.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Concerns about the unintended consequences of using pesticides in agricultural settings have led to a shift in practise towards more environmentally friendly methods such as composting, manuring and using plant growth-promoting bacteria. While compost is known for its ability to promote plant growth and serve as a soil amendment, little is known about the various types of bacteria that can be found in it and how effective they are in sustainable agriculture. This study was designed to assess the potency of a few common isolates from local compost by quantifying their capacity to fix nutrients, produce growth hormone, mitigate abiotic stress, produce lignocellulose-degrading enzyme and produce soil-amending enzyme, all while scaling them using an objective in silico method. In addition, the isolates were tested in the field against test crops selected from the monocot and dicot families, namely maize (Zea mays) and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). When comparing the treated settings to the untreated control setups, an increase was seen in the quantity of fruits (okra) and percentage of grain filling (maize). By creating a score system, an attempt was made to compare the efficiency of five strains based on the in vitro and in vivo experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.