Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808427›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026

Structured machine learning modeling to support conservation of deep-sea benthic biodiversity.

Gustavo Fonseca, Danilo C Vieira, Juliane C Carneiro, Renato S Carreira, Milena Ceccopieri, Thais N Corbisier, Adriana Galindo Dalto, Alberto G Figueiredo, Fabiane Gallucci, Paula Gheller and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Structured machine learning modeling to support conservation of deep-sea benthic biodiversity.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Gustavo FonsecaInstituto do Mar, UNIFESP, Santos, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8625-4279
Danilo C VieiraInstituto do Mar, UNIFESP, Santos, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7989-6553
Juliane C CarneiroGeology and Geophysics Department, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi, Brazil.
Renato S CarreiraDepartamento de Química, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Milena CeccopieriDepartamento de Química, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Thais N CorbisierInstituto Oceanográfico, USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Adriana Galindo DaltoDepartamento de Biologia Marinha, IB, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alberto G FigueiredoGeology and Geophysics Department, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi, Brazil.
Fabiane GallucciInstituto do Mar, UNIFESP, Santos, Brazil.
Paula GhellerInstituto Oceanográfico, USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Simone Brito de JesusInstituto do Mar, UNIFESP, Santos, Brazil.
Helena Passeri LavradoDepartamento de Biologia Marinha, IB, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Letícia LazzariDepartamento de Química, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Eduardo Hilzendeger MarconPETROBRAS Research Center, Centro de Pesquisas Leopoldo Américo Miguez de Mello (CENPES), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Daniel Leite MoreiraPETROBRAS Research Center, Centro de Pesquisas Leopoldo Américo Miguez de Mello (CENPES), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rafael Bendayan de MouraDepartamento de Biologia Marinha, IB, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ellen PapeMarine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ana Cláudia Aoki SantarosaInstituto Oceanográfico, USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
João Regis Dos Santos FilhoFaculdade de Oceanografia, UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Silvia Helena de Mello E SousaInstituto Oceanográfico, USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thaisa Marques VicenteInstituto Oceanográfico, USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciana Erika YaginumaInstituto do Mar, UNIFESP, Santos, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8311-7364
Cinthia YamashitaInstituto Oceanográfico, USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wandrey WatanabeInstituto do Mar, UNIFESP, Santos, Brazil.

Funding

Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e BiocombustíveisConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico-CNPQ 306780/2022-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity monitoring programs need to deliver accurate, timely, and actionable predictions. To establish a predictive monitoring program for deep-sea benthos of the Santos Basin, Brazil, we developed a two-stage structured model that allowed comparison of biodiversity predictions obtained from environmental simulations (2M-Sim). We also modeled the environmental variables as a function of spatial and temporal variables and compared this model's predictions with predictions obtained from real environmental data (2M). We built unstructured models (1M) as references to evaluate whether the proposed structured approach was reliable. We expected no significant differences between 1M and 2M or between 2M and 2M-Sim. Data were obtained from 100 stations at depths of 25-2400 m during two surveys (2019 and 2021). In our model framework, we used 12 benthic macro- and meiofaunal variables, 44 sediment and water column environmental variables, and four spatial and temporal variables. We applied a random forest algorithm to the structured and unstructured models. All comparisons were performed with 20% of the dataset set aside for validation. The average accuracy was 72%, 69%, and 68% for the 1M, 2M, and 2M-Sim models, respectively. Accuracies of 2M ranged from 38% to 84% and were generally higher for macrofauna. The observed accuracy loss from 1M to 2M (3%) and from 2M to 2M-Sim (1%) was not significant for any biodiversity variable. The 2M model identified 30 significant environmental variables; bottom water parameters and sedimentary phytopigment and carbonate concentrations were the best predictors. Our approach supports biodiversity conservation by optimizing data needs and future sampling and by guiding data-driven management decisions for benthic biodiversity.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental MonitoringInvertebratesMachine LearningAnimalsBrazilPredictive Learning Modelsbenthosbentosbosque aleatoriocontinental marginenvironmental essential variablesmargen continentalmodelo estructuralmonitoreomonitoringrandom foreststructure modelingvariables ambientales significativas大陆边缘海底生物环境关键变量监测结构建模随机森林

Identifiers

PMID41808427
PMCPMC13392758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.