ArticleCancer medicine2026
Financial Toxicity in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated at Private Medicine Institutions in Brazil.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Financial toxicity (FT) refers to the negative impact of the financial burden of cancer diagnosis and treatment on patients' well-being. With rising global costs of oncologic therapies, diagnostics, and supportive care, FT has become a key concern in cancer care, influencing adherence, quality of life, and outcomes. Breast cancer, given its high prevalence and socioeconomic implications, is notably associated with FT. Beyond direct medical expenses, patients often face income loss and out-of-pocket costs for supportive care, which can significantly affect their therapeutic trajectory. Addressing FT is thus essential to ensure equitable cancer care. A 34-item questionnaire, including the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) tool, was administered to breast cancer patients treated at three private institutions in Brazil. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, linear regression, and ANOVA (p ≤ 0.05). Among 912 participants 85.1% self-identified as White. Most were married or in a stable union (67.8%), and 50.9% held a postgraduate degree. A majority (84.2%) had early-stage disease, 54.6% had been diagnosed within 2 years prior to the study, and 92.1% reported having health insurance. Despite this, 36.6% experienced a reduction in their standard of living following treatment, and 15.6% reported having to sell assets or property. The mean COST score was 24.2 (SD = 8.6; median = 25.0). Factors significantly associated with greater financial toxicity (lower COST scores) included age below 40 years, lack of health insurance, unemployment or medical leave, and household income below 10,000 BRL per month. These findings highlight the considerable financial burden experienced by breast cancer patients, even in the private healthcare system, and underscore the need for strategies to mitigate FT in oncology care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.