Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808363›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2026

Machine Learning Based Diagnostic Models for Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review.

Jaiden Nairne-Nagy, Rudraksh Gupta, Boopalan Ramasamy, Lucian Bogdan Solomon, Stuart A Callary

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Machine Learning Based Diagnostic Models for Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jaiden Nairne-NagyDiscipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, School of Medicine, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3429-4006
Rudraksh GuptaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-7466-6730
Boopalan RamasamyDiscipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, School of Medicine, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2708-8420
Lucian Bogdan SolomonDiscipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, School of Medicine, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6254-2372
Stuart A CallaryDiscipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, School of Medicine, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2892-5238

Funding

Stuart A. Callary held a Research Fellowship supported by The Hospital Research Foundation Group during the conduct of this study.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that affects up to 1.7% of patients within 2 years following total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PJI is associated with significant patient morbidity, reduction in quality of life, prolonged hospitalisation, and healthcare expenditure. With a 5-year mortality reported as high as 21%, PJI is one of the most feared complications of joint arthroplasty. Identification of PJI is of critical importance to ensure successful and definitive treatment. However, diagnosis remains challenging due to the lack of a gold standard, culture-negative infection, and varying sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests. The rapid expansion of machine learning (ML) in the literature has led to the emergence of models that utilise patient demographics, clinical features, serological studies, synovial fluid biomarkers, and imaging to improve PJI diagnostics. The purpose of this study was to describe the literature on using ML to diagnose PJI. A systematic review of the literature for original studies describing ML use in PJI diagnostics following THA or TKA was conducted. This review identified 12 studies applying ML to diagnose or predict PJI, through patient demographics, clinical features, and imaging. Most models demonstrated good predictive performance, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) from 0.68 to 0.993. However, few studies validated their models externally. In conclusion, ML presents a promising approach to enhance PJI diagnostic accuracy, which may reduce diagnostic delays and ensure appropriate treatment. Further studies are needed to assess the model's generalisability and validate these models in external cohorts. Statement of Clinical Significance: The diagnosis of PJI remains a challenge due to limitations in current diagnostic criteria. ML offers a data-driven approach to improve diagnostic accuracy, potentially allowing earlier and more accurate identification to ensure appropriate treatment in a timely manner.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHip ProsthesisKnee ProsthesisMachine LearningProsthesis-Related InfectionsHumansartificial intelligencemachine learningprosthetic joint infectiontotal hip arthroplastytotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41808363
PMCPMC12976461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.