Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808337›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Developing and Assessing the Acceptability of an Information Booklet for Patients in Surveillance for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: An Intervention Development Study.

Cheryl Grindell, Jane Hughes, Elizabeth Lumley, Alan Elstone, Jo Hall, Jonathan Michaels, Akhtar Nasim, Stephen Radley, Phil Shackley, Niall MacGregor Smith and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Cheryl GrindellSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Division of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0671-1498
Jane HughesSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Division of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1389-3402
Elizabeth LumleySheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Division of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8962-7568
Alan ElstoneUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1946-1099
Jo HallDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust, Chesterfield, Derbyshire, UK.
Jonathan MichaelsSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Division of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3422-7102
Akhtar NasimSheffield Vascular Institute, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6740-0063
Stephen RadleySheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Division of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3980-7712
Phil ShackleySheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Division of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1862-0596
Niall MacGregor Smithc/o PCAAAS, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.
Gerry StansbyUniversity and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5539-3049
Emily WoodSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Division of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1910-6230
Alicia O'CathainSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Division of Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4033-506X

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research 135031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United Kingdom and Sweden, men aged 65 are offered screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA). Men with small AAA enter a surveillance programme to monitor growth until the AAA is large enough for referral for treatment. Some men develop anxiety related to having an AAA or being in surveillance.

aimThe original aim was to develop and assess the acceptability of a new intervention to help men in surveillance manage anxiety. As the study progressed, the aim changed to developing an information booklet to address men's uncertainties about AAA and surveillance because uncertainties might lead to anxiety.

methodAn intervention development study was undertaken, following guidance in three phases: 1. Identifying need using surveys of screening staff and men, and qualitative interviews with men and family members; 2. Co-design of an intervention using a literature review, programme theory development, and two workshops with men, family members, and a patient representative; 3. Assessing the acceptability of the intervention using a telephone survey of 23 men in AAA surveillance.

resultAlthough the original aim was to develop an intervention to help men manage anxiety, men and screening staff identified the need for an information-based intervention to address men's uncertainties about AAA. Published evidence identified that uncertainty about health conditions or treatment can lead to anxiety, so the intervention taken forward was an information booklet to address men's uncertainties about AAA. A 16-page A5 booklet was developed with men and their family members, addressing why men had to wait for AAA to become large before referral for treatment, the risk of rupture for different sizes of AAA, and how to reduce the risk of rupture. In the telephone survey, 20/23 men in the AAA surveillance who read the draft booklet found it helpful because it addressed their uncertainties. They suggested minor refinements. A refined version of the prototype booklet was produced based on this feedback.

conclusionsA co-designed information booklet is available that addresses the uncertainties of men with AAA in surveillance. Future research should measure the impact of the information booklet on AAA-related anxiety. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: We set up a patient panel specifically for this study. We identified five men from different sources including asking the vascular clinicians on the team to invite patients to consider joining the panel and approaching existing health research studies patient panels to identify men who had AAA. One member of our team was the patient representative on the research committee for the NHS AAA Screening Programme in England. He attended all our patient panel meetings. The panel reviewed all the documents we used to invite men to different parts of the study, offered advice about recruitment, and gave feedback about the findings. They offered advice about the prototypes of the information booklet.

Indexed as

AnxietyAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalPamphletsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicAgedHumansMaleMass ScreeningPopulation SurveillanceSwedenUnited Kingdomabdominal aortic aneurysminformation bookletsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID41808337
PMCPMC12976147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.