Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808242›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026

Prescription Trends and Clinical Decision-Making in Neuropathic Pain Pharmacological Treatment: Results From a Cross-Sectional Survey by the Spanish Pain Society.

Miguel Á Huerta, Mónica Mayo-Moldes, Miguel M Garcia, Beliu García-Parra, Mercè Matute, Yolanda López-Tofiño, Nancy Paniagua, Mar Hernández-Secorún, Dolors Soler, Marcos Salmerón and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Miguel Á HuertaNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2842-0085
Mónica Mayo-MoldesNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8883-8673
Miguel M GarciaNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6910-0494
Beliu García-ParraNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4458-2711
Mercè MatuteNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.
Yolanda López-TofiñoNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7488-2451
Nancy PaniaguaNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6121-4446
Mar Hernández-SecorúnNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9678-3449
Dolors SolerNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.
Marcos SalmerónNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.
Julian TaylorNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2553-2348
Enrique VerdúNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0816-1146
José A ValenciaNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8965-8815
Silvia PicoNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4697-8819
Clara Díaz-AlejoNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5403-7306
Masahito KatsukiPhysical Education and Health Center, Nagaoka University of Technology, Niigata, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0192-5430
Ancor Serrano-AfonsoNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6099-6290
M Carmen Ruiz-CanteroNeuropathic Pain Working Group, Spanish Society of Pain (GTDN-SED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6968-0946

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuropathic pain (NP) is a complex chronic condition with limited therapeutic effectiveness. Despite multiple drug classes and international guidelines, real-world adherence remains inconsistent, and data on prescribing practices among pain specialists is scarce.

methodsWe conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey among members of the Spanish Pain Society in May 2025. A structured 62-item questionnaire assessed prescribing habits, decision-making criteria, guideline adherence, dosage patterns, and the recognition and management of tolerance. Sociodemographic and professional data were also collected.

resultsA total of 220 pain specialists (52% female) completed the survey; 28% had over 20 years of clinical experience. Satisfaction with current pharmacological options was modest, with 52% reporting dissatisfaction or indifference. Prescribing was mainly guided by clinical experience (43%) and guideline recommendations (36%). Gabapentin (45%) and pregabalin (40%) were the most frequent first-line choices, followed by tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline; 9%), duloxetine (5%) and venlafaxine (1%). Tramadol dominated second-line use (65%), followed by capsaicin (22%) or lidocaine (5%) patches. Half of the participants reported tolerance, typically after 3-12 months, managed mainly by dose escalation or switching drug classes. Dosage practices for gabapentinoids and antidepressants showed marked heterogeneity, with frequent deviations from recommended titration protocols.

conclusionsNP management in Spain shows variability and partial alignment with international guidelines. Gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants and duloxetine remain preferred treatments, but reliance on personal experience and awareness of tolerance hinder evidence-based practice. Quantifying Spanish pain specialists' views on tolerance supports calls for national consensus, better dosing education and further research to harmonise care and improve outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: This nationwide survey provides the first systematic assessment of neuropathic pain management in Spain, revealing marked variability, only partial adherence to international guidelines, and persistent reliance on clinical experience over evidence. It confirms gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants and duloxetine as preferred treatments, identifies continued tramadol use despite conflicting recommendations, and quantifies for the first time clinicians' perception and management of tolerance. These findings fill a major evidence gap and directly inform future national consensus, educational initiatives and clinical practice improvement.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsClinical Decision-MakingNeuralgiaPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultCross-Sectional StudiesDuloxetine HydrochlorideFemaleGabapentinGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregabalinSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesicsDuloxetine HydrochlorideGabapentinPregabalinclinical practicedrug prescriptionsguidelinehealth care surveysneuralgiatolerance

Identifiers

PMID41808242
PMCPMC12976174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.