ArticleBMC psychology2026
Psychometric validation of the responsibility scale and the mediating role of psychological distress in the association between personal responsibility and wellbeing in arab adults.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Self-Perceived Individual Health Responsibility Among Healthcare Workers: Associated Factors and Relationship with Preventive Behaviors-A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Responsibility plays a significant role in fostering mental health and wellbeing, encompassing personal accountability and societal contributions. This study aimed to validate the Responsibility Scale (RS), a psychometric tool designed to measure personal and social responsibility, using rigorous statistical methods. Participants included 256 adults (80.86% female) from diverse educational backgrounds, recruited through a convenience sampling method. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure, comprising personal and social dimensions, with acceptable model fit indices (CFI = .96, TLI = .94, RMSEA = .080). Both factors demonstrated strong loadings (≥ 0.50) and robust internal reliability (personal responsibility subscale α = .92; social responsibility subscale α = .94). Convergent validity was supported by significant positive correlations of personal responsibility with life satisfaction, resilience, religious coping, self-esteem, and grit, whereas social responsibility showed weaker but significant associations with life satisfaction, self-esteem, and grit. Discriminant validity was evidenced by negative correlations of personal responsibility with psychological distress, whereas the association between social responsibility and distress was non-significant. Measurement invariance testing confirmed configural, metric, and scalar invariance across gender. Analyses further indicated that psychological distress carried an indirect effect of responsibility on wellbeing. Personal and social responsibility were positively associated with life satisfaction (β = .57) and negatively associated with psychological distress (β = − .47), suggesting that part of the effect of responsibility on wellbeing operates through reduced psychological distress. These findings position the RS as a reliable and valid tool for assessing responsibility across cultural contexts, with particular relevance to Libyan Arab populations. The study underscores the importance of responsibility for flourishing and offers new insights for both research and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.