ArticleMolecular autism2026
Reduced task adaptation and contextual awareness in autistic adults during facial emotion recognition: evidence from mixed-effects modeling and automated facial analysis.
Article in Molecular autism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite significant advances in understanding facial emotion recognition (FER) in autistic adults in recent decades, the mechanisms underlying FER difficulties in individuals with autism remain unclear, with inconsistent findings across studies. A key limitation may be the reliance on aggregate accuracy scores, which overlook item- and subject-level variability. Here, we investigated the effects of task adaptation and stimulus properties on FER performance in autistic and non-autistic adults using mixed-effects modelling.
methodsA total of 120 autistic and 116 non-autistic participants completed the Berlin Emotion Recognition Test 2. Performance was analyzed on a trial-by-trial basis, considering trial number, stimulus properties—derived from automated facial analysis—and their interactions with diagnostic group. Response times were analyzed using mixed-effects linear regression models, while accuracy was analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression models.
resultsCompared with non-autistic participants, autistic participants demonstrated lower overall accuracy and slower responses, accompanied by significantly reduced task adaptation. Contextual ambiguity of stimulus faces moderated group differences in FER accuracy, with non-autistic subjects showing greater use of contextual information. Social-cognitive traits further moderated the effect of contextual ambiguity in autistic subjects. LIMITATIONS: Our findings are specific to the design and stimulus material of the Berlin Emotion Recognition Test 2 and may not generalize to other FER tasks. Furthermore, our sample did not include individuals with intellectual disabilities, limiting generalizability across the autism spectrum. Lastly, the reliability of stimulus property estimates derived from automated facial analysis may require validation on a larger sample of stimulus faces.
conclusionsOur findings reveal that differences in task adaptation and contextual cue processing underlie FER performance differences in individuals with autism, emphasizing the importance of participant- and item-level analysis. These results may inform future study designs and highlight the advantages of integrating automated FER with mixed-effects modeling in autism research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.