ArticlePlant methods2026
Non-destructive monitoring of root biomass in hydroponically grown leafy vegetables: comparison between machine learning-based RGB and hyperspectral imaging.
Article in Plant methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRoot biomass serves as a critical indicator of plant eco-physiological status and crop productivity, yet its non-destructive monitoring remains challenging because of its underground location. The use of transparent nutrient film technique (NFT) systems enables direct observation of entire root systems, rendering image-based phenotyping feasible. In this study, we investigated and compared the performance of RGB and hyperspectral imaging for predicting root dry weight in hydroponically grown spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.).
resultsUsing 430 root segments divided from 60 plants, three models were developed: (1) an area-based regression based on root coverage, (2) a convolutional neural network (CNN) using RGB images, and (3) a partial least squares regression (PLSR) model using hyperspectral data (450-950 nm). The area-based regression exhibited limited accuracy (R² = 0.446) because of saturation at high root coverage. The CNN model improved predictive performance (R² = 0.739) but tended to overestimate sparse roots as a result of resolution constraints. The PLSR model achieved the highest accuracy (R² = 0.822, RMSE = 0.019 g/segment), with significantly lower error than RGB-based approaches (P < 0.01). Variable importance in projection analysis indicated that PLSR effectively exploited spectral signatures at 450 nm (background contrast) and 750 nm (tissue scattering), thereby maintaining stable accuracy across the full biomass range. When validated using 104 independent plants, the PLSR model achieved high predictive accuracy. Furthermore, as a proof of concept, this model successfully visualized the spatiotemporal dynamics of root biomass accumulation over 50 days, with only a 7.70% relative error at harvest.
conclusionsTo our knowledge, this study is among the first to demonstrate the non-destructive monitoring of biomass distribution within entire root systems under production conditions. Hyperspectral imaging combined with PLSR outperforms RGB-based approaches by capturing spectral signatures that reflect internal tissue properties of roots, thereby overcoming limitations caused by morphological occlusion. This approach provides a robust tool for precision agriculture and high-throughput phenotyping, enabling continuous assessment of root growth through simple modifications to the existing hydroponic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.