ArticleMicrobiome2026
Ensemble test for microbiome data.
Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRecent research has revealed strong correlations between the human microbiome and various diseases. However, statistical analysis of microbiome data remains challenging due to its inherent sparsity and high dimensionality. PERMANOVA (Permutational multivariate analysis of variance using distance matrices) has been extensively employed to test the association between microbiome data and biological features. Its non-parametric nature makes it appealing, as it does not impose restrictions on data dimension or distribution. Despite its merits, several limitations have restricted its further application.
resultsThis paper introduces E-MANOVA (Ensemble multivariate analysis of variance using distance matrices), a method designed to address these limitations. Traditional PERMANOVA lacks consistent robustness across different distance metrics and association signals, which can lead to power reduction in specific scenarios. Leveraging the idea of ensemble learning, we construct base tests by taking the similarity matrix to the rth power and then combine these tests to build a final ensemble test. Our resulting test statistic exhibits high power and robustness compared to other existing methods. Furthermore, we employ direct moment approximation and the Pearson type III distribution to approximate the permutation null distribution, completely avoiding the computationally intensive permutation procedure. Finally, we utilize the Cauchy combination method to aggregate p-values from multiple distances, eliminating the need to pre-specify a single distance measure before analysis.
conclusionsOur extensive simulations demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms existing methods across various situations. Further analysis of real data from cigarette smokers and curated microbiome data shows that our proposed method identifies the highest number of significant associations among all competing methods. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.