ArticleBMC health services research2026
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on a population-based lung cancer screening programme in Flanders: a cross-sectional survey study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. In Belgium, this burden is comparable, with high rates of late-stage diagnosis and correspondingly poor outcomes. While low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening has proven to be effective in reducing mortality among high-risk groups, Belgium has not yet implemented a population-based screening programme. The success of such a programme will not solely depend on public uptake, but also on the active support of healthcare providers (HCPs), who are central to its successful implementation. This study explores the perspectives and perceptions of Flemish HCPs towards lung cancer screening.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was distributed to general practitioners, pharmacists, tobacco treatment specialists, and medical specialists in Flanders (Belgium). The questionnaire included items assessing perceptions toward lung cancer screening, perceived benefits and barriers, clinical readiness, and expectations regarding programme implementation. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data, including subgroup analyses based on gender, professional role, and years of experience.
resultsA total of 415 HCPs participated in the survey. Overall, 91% considered population-based lung cancer screening important or very important, and 86.3% anticipated a positive impact on the healthcare system. More than 62% reported a high willingness to refer patients once a screening programme is implemented. The most frequently cited barriers to successful implementation included insufficient training (47%), limited staff or resources (37%), and logistical challenges (32%). An exploratory correlation analysis further revealed a significant positive association between perceived healthcare impact and willingness to refer patients.
conclusionsHCPs in Flanders generally support the implementation of a population-based lung cancer screening programme. However, addressing practical and organisational barriers will be crucial to ensure sustainable engagement. Promoting interprofessional collaboration, strengthening documentation of smoking history, and integrating screening workflows into existing healthcare systems may enhance efficiency and equity. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.