ArticleBMC nursing2026
Implementation and challenges of patient safety education for undergraduate nursing students: a scoping review.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to map and analyze the existing literature on the development of patient safety knowledge in undergraduate nursing education, with a focus on the implementation modalities, effectiveness, and evaluation instruments of patient safety education programs, and to describe the challenges encountered when delivering patient safety education to undergraduate nursing students.
methodsThis scoping review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s 5-step framework and adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) reporting guideline. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple Chinese and English databases, including CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase. This review imposed no language restrictions on published publications, with the search period spanning from the inception of each database to 2024. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Data were synthesized narratively; quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were subjected to narrative synthesis.
resultsOf 2,622 retrieved records, 19 studies published between 2009 and 2024 met inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies (76%) originated from Asia. Study designs were predominantly quasi‑experimental (≈ 70%), with four randomised controlled trials (≈ 23%), two mixed‑methods studies, and one qualitative study; sample sizes ranged from 21 to 181. Interventions varied in content and duration and commonly comprised lectures, group discussions, case analysis, and scenario‑based simulation; several programmes referenced WHO or QSEN frameworks. Outcomes chiefly addressed students’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes; behavioural and outcome‑level measures were infrequently reported. Frequently used instruments included the H‑PEPSS and WHO‑derived questionnaires. Reported implementation challenges included short intervention duration, small sample sizes, single‑site designs, limited faculty training, reliance on self‑report measures, and lack of long‑term follow‑up.
conclusionsPatient safety curricula for undergraduate nursing students should be standardized across the entire nursing program, delivered through a diverse array of educational modalities, and evaluated using multi-faceted assessment instruments to achieve effective learning and ensure translation into safe practice. Ultimately, fostering a safety culture through robust patient safety education can make a significant contribution to advancements in nursing education and patient safety, benefiting both healthcare providers and recipients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.