Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808110›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2026

Local knowledge, exploitation and population status of Terminalia glabrescens Mart. in the Northeast of Brazil.

Clarissa Lessa Nascimento, Júlio Marcelino Monteiro, José Ribamar Sousa Júnior

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clarissa Lessa NascimentoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação (PPGBC), Laboratório de Etnobiologia e Conservação (LECON), Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Floriano, PI, Brasil.
Júlio Marcelino MonteiroPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação (PPGBC), Laboratório de Etnobiologia e Conservação (LECON), Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Floriano, PI, Brasil.
José Ribamar Sousa JúniorPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação (PPGBC), Laboratório de Etnobiologia e Conservação (LECON), Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Floriano, PI, Brasil. sousajr@ufpi.edu.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Terminalia glabrescens Mart. is a native tree widely exploited in Northeastern Brazil, particularly known for its medicinal and timber properties. Although it is frequently harvested, the consequences of extractive practices have not been assessed; therefore, this study examined the uses and influences of extractivism on the species population status. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 86 participants, who mentioned 27 different uses across six categories: medicinal, utensils, construction, fuel, food, and fodder. Three plots of 50 × 50 m were demarcated, where individuals were identified, measured for diameter, and their height. The study indicated a preference for collecting trees of tall and intermediate size and thickness, which are considered ideal and versatile for various uses. An association was found between the forms of use and the gender of the participants, with men having more citations in all use categories, particularly in the timber context. It was observed that the population of the species did not fit the "inverted J" model, suggesting that extractivism may primarily affect trees in intermediate size classes. Although this study does not directly assess levels of exploitation, the results may be attributed mainly to timber exploitation.

Indexed as

EthnobotanyKnowledgeTerminaliaAdultBrazilFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreesEthnobotanyPlant resource usePopulation ecologyWoody plant

Identifiers

PMID41808110
PMCPMC13088697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.