ArticleBMC oral health2026
Root canal segmentation from cone-beam computed tomography guided by micro-computed tomography based on deep learning.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate root canal segmentation from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is essential for endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. This study aims to explore the feasibility of using deep learning (DL) models, trained on CBCT images of extracted teeth guided by micro-computed tomography (µCT), for clinical CBCT image segmentation.
methodsA dataset of 56 extracted teeth with diverse root canal complexities was constructed, combining CBCT and µCT scans. Ground truth annotations were derived from µCT-based masks and registered to CBCT images. DL models based on U2-Net architecture were trained and evaluated for tooth and root canal segmentation, comparing µCT-guided and manual-label-based approaches. We further investigated the impact of voxel size and image resampling on performance. Finally, the trained models were applied to segment root canals in clinical CBCT images, with the results validated by endodontic specialists.
resultsThe µCT-guided AI segmentation method outperformed the manual-label-based approach. Utilizing a smaller native voxel size (80 μm), coupled with image resampling, proved particularly advantageous for capturing intricate anatomical details. In clinical validation, the model delivered rapid and accurate root canal segmentation, with 94% of single-rooted teeth and 100% of molars rated as “excellent” or “good”.
conclusionsResults demonstrated the potential of µCT-guided AI models for enhancing root canal segmentation in clinical practice, offering a promising tool for digital dentistry. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.