Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41808001›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2026

Comprehensive mitogenomic insights into Hemibagrus velox endemic to Sumatra, Indonesia and its phylogenetic relationships within the Bagridae lineage.

Angkasa Putra, Sarifah Aini, Hamdani, Soo Rin Lee, Ah Ran Kim, Tatty Yuniarti, Sang Van Vu, Jung Hwa Choi, Won-Kyo Jung, Hyun-Woo Kim and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Novel Mitogenome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Angkasa Putra *Interdisciplinary Program of Marine and Fisheries Sciences and Convergent Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5533-9437
Sarifah Aini *Interdisciplinary Program of Marine and Fisheries Sciences and Convergent Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1065-4724
HamdaniJakarta Technical University of Fisheries, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Jakarta, 12520, Republic of Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6484-2862
Soo Rin LeeMarine Integrated Biomedical Technology Center, National Key Research Institutes in Universities, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6443-855X
Ah Ran KimMarine Integrated Biomedical Technology Center, National Key Research Institutes in Universities, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2903-6800
Tatty YuniartiJakarta Technical University of Fisheries, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Jakarta, 12520, Republic of Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7716-8846
Sang Van VuFaculty of Biology, University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 11400, Vietnam.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1929-4419
Jung Hwa ChoiOcean and Fisheries Development International Cooperation Institute, College of Fisheries Science, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3392-0818
Won-Kyo JungMarine Integrated Biomedical Technology Center, National Key Research Institutes in Universities, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1615-750X
Hyun-Woo KimMarine Integrated Biomedical Technology Center, National Key Research Institutes in Universities, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1357-5893
Hye-Eun KangInstitute of Marine Life Science, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea. kanghe24@pukyong.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3202-6120
Shantanu KunduInterdisciplinary Program of Marine and Fisheries Sciences and Convergent Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea. shantanu1984@pknu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5488-4433

Funding

Ministry of Education Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (RS-2021-NR060118)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Bagridae (Actinopteri: Siluriformes) catfish Hemibagrus velox, endemic to Sumatra, Indonesia, raises critical taxonomic concerns due to limited molecular evidence. Recent advances in mitogenomic approaches offer a robust framework for resolving such ambiguities. Accordingly, the present study aims to characterize the complete mitogenome of H. velox and to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of gene structure and variation among its congeners, as well as to evaluate its phylogenetic position within the broader bagrid lineage.

resultsThe current investigation reveals the mitogenome of H. velox (16,512 bp), comprising 37 genes, a non-coding control region (CR), an overall A + T bias of 58.09%, eleven intergenic spacers, and six overlapping regions. Most protein-coding genes (PCGs) in Hemibagrus species initiated translation with the standard ATG start codon, except for the COI gene (GTG). The amino acid composition analysis exhibited a high frequency of leucine, serine, and arginine residues, whereas methionine and tryptophan were the least abundant. The ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions indicated strong purifying selection acting on the PCGs across Hemibagrus species. The secondary structure of 21 transfer RNAs showed the typical cloverleaf structure, except for tRNA-Ser (S1). The comparative analysis of conserved sequence blocks within the CR among eight Hemibagrus species established variation in length and nucleotide composition, with tandem repeats exclusively found in H. guttatus within the extended termination-associated sequence region. The phylogenetic analyses employing Bayesian inference, Maximum-likelihood, and Neighbor-joining methods demonstrated that Hemibagrus is a non-monophyletic group within the family Bagridae.

conclusionsCollectively, this study provides a detailed genetic characterization of H. velox and its seven congeners. The inferred matrilineal evolutionary pattern further strengthens earlier hypotheses regarding the delineation of genera within the broader Bagridae lineage. Furthermore, the findings underscore the urgent need to expand mitogenomic datasets for other bagrid catfishes to enhance the resolution of their systematics, evolutionary relationships, and biogeographic interpretations, thereby facilitating evidence-based conservation efforts and effective fisheries management.

Indexed as

CatfishesGenome, MitochondrialGenomicsPhylogenyAnimalsEvolution, MolecularIndonesiaRNA, TransferRNA, TransferBagrid catfishesCladisticsConservationEvolutionFreshwater speciesMitochondrial genome

Identifiers

PMID41808001
PMCPMC13085329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.