ReviewOral and maxillofacial surgery2026
Craniofacial speargun injuries: report of three cases, literature review and proposed management guidelines for maxillo-facial surgeons.
Review in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Impact of a Horse Kick: A Systematic Review of Horse-Related Maxillofacial Trauma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Speargun injuries of the head and neck are extremely rare but potentially devastating because of the high density of vital structures in this region. Most available data derive from isolated case reports, and guidance specific to oral and maxillofacial surgeons remains limited. We report three patients with craniofacial speargun injuries managed in a maxillofacial surgery setting, illustrating three distinct scenarios with increasing complexity: an isolated sinonasal trajectory confined to the midface, an anterior cranial fossa trajectory following a submental/oral entry, and a transoral posterior fossa trajectory associated with diffuse haemorrhage and delayed neurological deterioration. Review of the literature confirms recurrent patterns in entry sites, trajectories, complications and outcomes, and supports several key principles: early airway control, systematic cross-sectional and vascular imaging, multidisciplinary planning, and anatomically driven choice between retrograde and anterograde extraction with watertight skull-base reconstruction. These concepts are crucial for maxillofacial surgeons facing these rare but high-risk injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.