ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Saccadic variability in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) exhibit delayed saccades and saccadic hypometria; Still, the diagnostic yield of saccadic parameters is limited in clinical settings. We hypothesized that, as motor fluctuations, fluctuations would also be documented on saccadic parameters, and these could serve as a feasible interpretative measure for clinical application. This cross-sectional study evaluated a prospectively recruited de novo cohort of 114 patients with PD in South Korea, collected from February 2022 to August 2024. All participants performed horizontal and vertical saccades following a target that alternately appeared on a light bar every 2 s. The mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (CV) of saccadic latency, amplitude, and velocity were analyzed. Dynamic time warping (DTW) was applied to assess the temporal variability of saccadic sequences, including control-deviation DTW (CD-DTW) and population-variability DTW (PV-DTW). The data were compared to those obtained from 70 age- and sex-matched healthy participants. Patients with PD showed a higher CV of saccadic amplitude, both horizontally (p < 0.001) and vertically (p < 0.001), compared with the healthy controls. Latency-, amplitude-, and velocity-based CV and CD-DTW features positively correlated with age and MDS-UPDRS-III. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the logistic regression model combining CD-DTW and CV for horizontal saccadic amplitude had the highest discriminatory power (area under the curve of 0.848 [95% confidence interval = 0.777-0.908]; false discovery rate-adjusted q = 0.039). Patients with PD showed a higher saccadic variability than healthy controls, which was correlated with the severity of motor symptoms. Saccadic variability, as well as bradykinesia observed in the extremities, likely reflects the sequence effect of PD. Therefore, saccadic analyses may aid in PD diagnosis and severity assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41807855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.