ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Rapid and Efficient Aerosol Delivery During 60 L/min High Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy-In Vitro Development of a Novel Dry Powder Delivery Platform.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High flow therapy (HFT) delivers heated and humidified gas at flow rates up to 60 L/min to hypoxemic subjects, but is not conducive to simultaneous administration of pharmaceutical aerosols. Aerosol losses occur due to circuit wall impaction, environmental loss and particle growth from high humidity; resulting in poor lung delivery efficiency. This study compares two strategies for delivering dry powder aerosols during 60 L/min humidified HFT: a circuit connector (HFT-CC) which integrates directly into the standard HFT flow pathway, and an interface connector (HFT-IC) designed to bypass delivery line losses by directly injecting aerosol into the nasal prongs. Experiments were conducted using an anatomically-realistic in vitro adult nasal airway model with physiological breathing patterns, albuterol sulfate excipient enhanced growth (AS-EEG) dry powder formulation, air-jet aerosolization engine, and custom air actuation system. The HFT-CC approach improved lung delivery to 25.6% compared to existing published data (12.8%) but was limited by losses in the circuit tubing and nasal interface. The HFT-IC approach with a split nasal interface achieved 45.1% lung delivery (HFT-IC3), nearly a fourfold improvement from previously published results, by isolating aerosol flow from HFT flow and eliminating upstream losses. While nose-throat (NT) deposition in HFT-IC3 remained high (39.6%), this approach presents an attractive target for future computational and experimental optimization. These findings prove that efficient dry powder aerosol lung delivery during 60 L/min humidified HFT is achievable, laying the groundwork for translational advances in the efficient delivery of pulmonary therapies such as surfactants, antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and antivirals during ventilatory support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41807796What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.