ReviewArchives of toxicology2026
Neurodevelopmental effects of methylmercury (MeHg): a review of epidemiological points of departure (PoDs), toxicological reference values (TRVs), and key uncertainties in human health risk assessment.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adverse neurological effects of methylmercury are well characterized in animal models and humans. Neurodevelopmental effects in infants and children following prenatal exposure to methylmercury have been the critical endpoint used for many years in risk assessment for the derivation of toxicological reference values. Most risk assessments of methylmercury have continued to rely on the same epidemiological birth-cohorts from New Zealand, the Faroe Islands, and the Seychelles, in which neurodevelopmental effects of methylmercury were examined during the 1980s and 1990s. New epidemiological studies have since emerged, prompting several organizations to reassess whether current reference values remain protective. As these evaluations proceed, clarity on the basis for derivation of the existing values will be critical particularly if different toxicological reference values are recommended. This review summarizes the history, pivotal data, and methodologies used by different regulatory bodies and expert committees (US EPA, ATSDR, Health Canada, JECFA, and EFSA) to derive toxicological reference values for neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal methylmercury exposure. Although methodologies differed in the choice of points of departure, uncertainty factors, and dosimetry conversions, there is good agreement between the toxicological reference values derived by these organizations. Nonetheless, there remain important uncertainties and data gaps particularly related to how observational epidemiology data were used in derivation of the toxicological reference values. Discussion of these uncertainties should help inform future work on methylmercury and have broader implications for other chemical risk assessments relying on similar types of observational data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.