ArticleMedical physics2026
Out-of-beam artifact suppression in charged nuclear fragment based carbon-ion radiotherapy monitoring.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCarbon-ion radiotherapy offers highly precise targeting of tumors while sparing healthy tissue compared to X-ray therapy. However, this precision comes at the cost of an increased sensitivity of the treatment to range uncertainties, which can arise from anatomical changes of the patient. Our group develops an in-vivo treatment monitoring method by tracking of charged nuclear fragments using hybrid silicon pixel detectors. PURPOSE: Anatomical changes outside of the region accessed by carbon-ion beams are clinically not relevant, as they do not affect the dose distribution. However, they can potentially influence the fragment data, producing artifacts, which might be interpreted as signals produced by clinically relevant anatomical changes. This misinterpretation would cause unnecessary clinical action, like performing a CT scan. This work proposes methods for the identification and suppression of clinically irrelevant artifacts with the aim of avoiding unnecessary clinical action.
methodsA clinically relevant and an irrelevant anatomical change are emulated by introducing coin-sized air cavities at different positions in a homogeneous cylindrical plastic head phantom. Charged nuclear fragments are detected by a Timepix3-based mini-tracker during irradiations of this phantom with a clinically realistic treatment plan. All measurements are performed for two different positions of the mini-tracker. The reconstructed fragmentation vertex distributions are analyzed and compared to those of reference measurements.
resultsA significant signal from the clinically irrelevant air cavity was observed. This artifact was found to differ from the signal of the clinically relevant cavity. Most importantly, the location of the artifact changes with the mini-tracker position, whereas the relevant signal remains unchanged. This facilitates identification of the artifact as well as its suppression by combining the data from several mini-trackers at different positions around the patient.
conclusionsClinically irrelevant changes were shown to potentially impede carbon-ion treatment monitoring by tracking of charged nuclear fragments. However, positioning several mini-trackers around the patient, which monitor the treatment from different perspectives, was found to be the key to the identification and suppression of artifacts from anatomical changes outside of the region accessed by carbon-ion beams. This is implemented in the detection system of an ongoing clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.