ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning identifies distinct movement control impairment clusters in patients with chronic neck pain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robust Unsupervised Analysis of Longitudinal Functional Trajectories in Older Inpatients Reveals Stable Recovery Profiles: The AIRCOT Study.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with chronic neck pain experience various impairments, with reduced movement control suggested as a significant contributing factor. The heterogeneity of this patient population and suboptimal rehabilitation outcomes suggests the existence of latent subgroup characteristics. The aim of this study was to identify distinct groups among patients with neck pain based on the movement control test and pain intensity and to provide information on cluster-specific impairments. 135 patients with idiopathic neck pain performed a movement control test (the Butterfly test) at three difficulty levels and were assessed for pain intensity, providing 13 different parameters (classifiers). Louvain, hierarchical and k-means clustering methods were applied and the number of clusters determined by observing the symmetry and size of silhouette scores. Further, different machine learning algorithms were applied to develop and evaluate a classification framework (based on AUC, classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity) and to provide information on individual cluster characteristics using the Shapley Additive Explanations. The k-means and deep learning neural network methods provided the most efficient clustering and classification performance extracting 4 meaningful clusters. Patients between groups differed in the amount of impairment, with cluster 2 and 1 representing the most severe impairments and with clusters 3 and 4 the least severe impairments. Additionally, specific motor control impairments were observed in individual clusters suggesting distinct neck movement control adaptations. Identifying subgroups of patients with neck pain and their specific characteristics based on the results of the Butterfly test may inform future development of targeted rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.