Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807729›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Assessing the applicability of big data driven urban vibrancy analysis in mixed urbanized-depopulated contexts: a case study of a Japanese city.

Yoshinao Ishii, Keiichiro Hayakawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yoshinao IshiiToyota Central R&D Labs., Inc., 41-1, Yokomichi, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1192, Japan. Y-Ishii@mosk.tytlabs.co.jp.
Keiichiro HayakawaToyota Central R&D Labs., Inc., 41-1, Yokomichi, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1192, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between the built environment and urban vibrancy is crucial for effective urban planning and policy development. While recent research using big data and regression analysis has identified built environment factors associated with vibrancy, most studies focus on densely populated urban cores. However, many cities now contain both thriving centers and depopulated areas, which pose sustainability challenges and require targeted strategies. This study investigates whether conventional big data driven approaches can provide reliable, context-sensitive insights when applied to a city encompassing both urbanized and depopulated areas, particularly under data limitations. Using Toyota City, Japan, as a case study, we employed large-scale GPS trajectory data as a proxy for human activity and constructed built environment factors from readily available Geographic Information System data, including land-use maps, building-use/stock information, road and railway networks, and point of interest (POI) locations, to quantify key dimensions of the built environment, namely diversity, density, and accessibility. Global and local regression models were applied to analyze spatial variation in relationships between vibrancy and built environment factors. The results show that these relationships differ markedly between urbanized and depopulated areas; for example, POI density correlates strongly with vibrancy in urbanized areas, whereas residential density is more critical in depopulated areas. These findings demonstrate that big data driven vibrancy analysis can yield meaningful insights even in data-scarce contexts, extending its applicability to diverse urbanized-depopulated settings.

Identifiers

PMID41807729
PMCPMC12979653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.