Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807718›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Automated interpretation of fetal cardiac function evaluation from the echocardiogram.

Caixin Huang, Lihe Zhang, Baihong Xie, Yuting Jiang, Yunxiao Zhu, Xiaozhen Liu, Ting Lei, Miao He, Yafei Yan, Nan Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Caixin HuangDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lihe ZhangDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Baihong XieSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yuting JiangDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yunxiao ZhuDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaozhen LiuDepartment of Ultrasonic Imaging, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Ting LeiDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Miao HeDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yafei YanGuangzhou Aiyunji Information Technology Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Nan WangGuangzhou Aiyunji Information Technology Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hongning XieDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. xiehn@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

the Guangdong Provincial Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund Project 2022A1515220200the Guangzhou Science and Technology Program 2024A04J4569the National Scientific Foundation Committee of China 81801705the National Scientific Foundation Committee of China 82171938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal assessment of fetal cardiac function is crucial for predicting neonatal outcomes, yet manual echocardiographic measurements are labor-intensive and subjective. We developed a fully automated artificial intelligence (AI) workflow for estimating fetal cardiac function parameters from echocardiograms. The workflow integrates a deep learning model for real-time detection and segmentation of cardiac structures, followed by quality control and geometric calculation. It was developed and validated using an internal dataset of 52,942 annotated images from 1940 normal fetal echocardiograms, with further testing on two external normal datasets (245 echocardiograms) and one internal abnormal dataset (83 echocardiograms). Performance was compared against manual and Fetal Heart Quantification (Fetal HQ) measurements, and a dynamic Z-score model referencing gestational age and fetal biometrics was established. The AI achieved accurate segmentation, with mean Dice similarity coefficients >92% and mean intersection-over-union >85% across all test datasets. It exhibited higher intraclass correction coefficients and R-values relative to experts than inter-observer variability, alongside smaller mean absolute error and limits of agreement. The mean individual equivalence coefficients of all cardiac function parameters were below zero, indicating lower variability than manual or Fetal HQ. These results demonstrate that our fully automated AI workflow enables accurate, efficient, and reproducible quantification of fetal cardiac function, supporting its potential for standardized clinical application.

Identifiers

PMID41807718
PMCPMC13106771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.