ArticleScientific reports2026
Substrate temperature effects on structure and thermoelectric transport in DC-sputtered Bi
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The thermoelectric performance of Bi₂Te₃ thin films is highly sensitive to deposition temperature because substrate heating simultaneously controls microstructure, stoichiometry, and charge transport. Here, ~ 450 nm Bi₂Te₃ films were deposited on glass by single-target DC magnetron sputtering while varying the substrate temperature from room temperature to 300 °C (RT, 100 °C, 200 °C, 300 °C). FESEM reveals progressive grain coarsening and improved grain connectivity with increasing temperature, while cross-sectional imaging confirms a comparable film thickness across all samples. EDS shows a monotonic Te-loss trend at elevated substrate temperatures, indicating increasing deviation from stoichiometric Bi₂Te₃. XRD confirms crystalline Bi₂Te₃ formation for all conditions and shows systematic peak shifts/lattice-spacing trends with temperature; no distinct elemental Bi or Te peaks are detected within measurement limits. Hall and transport measurements demonstrate that electrical conductivity increases with substrate temperature, whereas the Seebeck response decreases in magnitude, reflecting the expected conductivity–thermopower trade-off as composition and carrier transport evolve. The power factor ([Formula: see text]) reaches a maximum of ~ 4 µW cm⁻¹ K⁻² for films deposited at 200 °C, identifying an intermediate-temperature window that optimizes the balance between conductivity and thermopower for this DC-sputtering route. UV–Vis reflectance analysis indicates a substrate-temperature-dependent increase in the apparent optical bandgap extracted from Kubelka–Munk/Tauc-type treatment in the 300–1100 nm window, which is reported as an apparent optical metric rather than the intrinsic Bi₂Te₃ bandgap. Overall, these results establish ~ 200 °C as the most favorable substrate temperature in this study for achieving high PF Bi₂Te₃ thin films on glass and provide practical processing guidance for thermoelectric thin-film optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.