ArticleScientific reports2026
Predominance of multidrug-resistant bacteria with high resistance to empiric antibiotics in diabetic foot ulcers: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) pose a serious clinical challenge due to their chronic nature and high risk of infection. DFUs present polymicrobial infections frequently involving antibiotic-resistant bacteria, complicating treatment and increasing the risk of amputations. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 153 DFU patients to analyze the bacterial profile of DFUs and prevailing patterns of antibiotic resistance. The pathogenic bacteria isolated from DFUs were predominantly Gram-positive (62%), with Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) being the most frequent isolates along with Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Over 60% of Gram-positive bacteria and 95% of Gram-negative bacteria were multidrug resistant with a median resistance to 9-11 antibiotics, most of which are in the prescribed regimen for diabetic foot infections. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was observed in approximately 95% of Gram-negative and 60-87% of Gram-positive isolates. We categorized the antibiotics following the AWaRe (Access (A), Watch (W), Reserve (R)) classification and have identified the antibiotics that can be prioritized for treatment of DFU leaving out the reserve category only for treating MDR bacteria. The findings underscore the need for prudent use of antibiotics, microbiological profiling of DFU bacteria and periodic updates to the empirical treatment regimen to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.