Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807656›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Predominance of multidrug-resistant bacteria with high resistance to empiric antibiotics in diabetic foot ulcers: a cross-sectional study.

Natasha Nabila Mohammed Shoaib, Ebenezer Chitra, Jing Rou Ong, Willem B Jay Tan, Vasantha Kumari Neela, Ashraf Hakim Ab Halim, Fabian Davamani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Natasha Nabila Mohammed Shoaib *Centre for Postgraduate Studies by Research, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia.
Ebenezer Chitra *Division of Applied Biomedical Science and Biotechnology, School of Health Sciences, IMU University, 126 Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia.
Jing Rou Ong *Division of Applied Biomedical Science and Biotechnology, School of Health Sciences, IMU University, 126 Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia.
Willem B Jay Tan *Division of Applied Biomedical Science and Biotechnology, School of Health Sciences, IMU University, 126 Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia.
Vasantha Kumari NeelaDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia.
Ashraf Hakim Ab HalimOrthopaedic Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43000, Malaysia.
Fabian DavamaniDivision of Applied Biomedical Science and Biotechnology, School of Health Sciences, IMU University, 126 Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia. fabian_davamani@imu.edu.my.

Funding

International Medical University MMHS 1/2018 (01)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) pose a serious clinical challenge due to their chronic nature and high risk of infection. DFUs present polymicrobial infections frequently involving antibiotic-resistant bacteria, complicating treatment and increasing the risk of amputations. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 153 DFU patients to analyze the bacterial profile of DFUs and prevailing patterns of antibiotic resistance. The pathogenic bacteria isolated from DFUs were predominantly Gram-positive (62%), with Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) being the most frequent isolates along with Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Over 60% of Gram-positive bacteria and 95% of Gram-negative bacteria were multidrug resistant with a median resistance to 9-11 antibiotics, most of which are in the prescribed regimen for diabetic foot infections. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was observed in approximately 95% of Gram-negative and 60-87% of Gram-positive isolates. We categorized the antibiotics following the AWaRe (Access (A), Watch (W), Reserve (R)) classification and have identified the antibiotics that can be prioritized for treatment of DFU leaving out the reserve category only for treating MDR bacteria. The findings underscore the need for prudent use of antibiotics, microbiological profiling of DFU bacteria and periodic updates to the empirical treatment regimen to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDiabetic FootDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceAWaRe classificationDiabetic foot ulcerMultidrug resistance

Identifiers

PMID41807656
PMCPMC13100025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.