ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimizing abrasive wear in sustainable MCC reinforced hemp bamboo epoxy composites for tribological applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the two-body abrasive wear characteristics of hybrid hemp and bamboo fibers in woven form epoxy (H/B F-Ep) composites reinforced with micro-crystalline cellulose (MCC) using a response surface methodology (RSM) framework and microstructural analysis. The effects of MCC content, emery paper grit, load, and abrading distance, on weight loss, coefficient of friction (CoF), and surface roughness (Ra) were assessed using four factors and three levels using Box–Behnken design. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to develop and statistically validate quadratic regression models, which demonstrated strong predictive ability, a non-significant lack-of-fit, and high coefficients of determination (R² = 95.84–97.06%). Emery paper grit and abrading distance dominate wear loss, MCC content controls frictional response, and both MCC and grit have a substantial impact on surface roughness, according to an ANOVA. Strong nonlinear wear behavior under severe abrasion is indicated by significant interaction and quadratic terms, especially grit2 and filler–grit coupling. Optimized MCC loading reduces micro-cutting and stabilizes tribo-layer development, as indicated by main-effects and interaction plots. The statistical results were supported by SEM measurements, which showed a shift from severe micro-ploughing and fiber pull-out in unfilled composites to moderate abrasion and compacted tribo-films at the optimal MCC content. To minimize wear loss (0.0385 g), CoF (0.27), and Ra (1.62 μm), with an overall desirability of 0.96, multi-response desirability optimization determined that 3 wt% MCC, 400-grit abrasive, 150 m abrading distance, and 10 N load were the optimal settings. A strong framework for customizing natural fiber hybrid composites for tribological applications is provided by the combined RSM–SEM technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.