ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Evaluating the feasibility of robotic-assisted abdominal aortic replacement in a porcine model.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility and procedural safety of robotic-assisted abdominal aortic replacement (RAAAR) using a porcine model, with the goal of supporting the future clinical translation of robotic aortic surgery. Eight healthy adult pigs underwent total robotic-assisted abdominal aortic replacement using the domestic MedBot® robotic system (KD-SR-2000 and JinFeng platforms). Perioperative monitoring included heart rate, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, and core temperature. Surgical parameters such as operative time, blood loss, and tissue integrity were also assessed. All eight procedures were completed successfully without conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. The median operative time was 129 min (IQR: 122–132), with dissection, exposure, and cross-clamping times of 41 min (IQR: 39–43), 34.2 min (IQR: 32–35), and 68 min (IQR: 66–72), respectively. Anastomosis times for the anterior and posterior aortic walls were 10.5 min (IQR: 9–11) and 15 min (IQR: 14–16), with no leaks observed. The median number of stitches was 27 (IQR: 26–28), and time per stitch was less than 90 s. Estimated blood loss was 59.5 mL (IQR: 48–63), and bleeding after clamp release was 20 mL (IQR: 15–22). Vital signs remained stable intraoperatively, and postmortem examination revealed no bleeding, leakage, or organ injury. RAAAR demonstrated technical feasibility and procedural safety in a large animal model. These findings provide experimental support for the future clinical application of robotic-assisted aortic surgery in human AAA treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41807645What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.