Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807645›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Evaluating the feasibility of robotic-assisted abdominal aortic replacement in a porcine model.

Yiqi Lai, Jiansheng Xiao, Guohao Wu, Dongming Ye, Hong Zhang, Xuesong Li, Caiyong Lai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yiqi Lai *Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
Jiansheng Xiao *Department of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan Eastern Central Hospital, Dongguan, 523560, China.
Guohao WuDepartment of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan Eastern Central Hospital, Dongguan, 523560, China.
Dongming YeDepartment of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan Eastern Central Hospital, Dongguan, 523560, China.
Hong ZhangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Dongguan Eastern Central Hospital, Dongguan, 523560, China.
Xuesong LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 101500, China. pineneedle@sina.com.
Caiyong LaiDepartment of Urology, Miyun Hospital, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 101500, China. 2213625684@qq.com.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China Grant No. 2023YFC2413400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility and procedural safety of robotic-assisted abdominal aortic replacement (RAAAR) using a porcine model, with the goal of supporting the future clinical translation of robotic aortic surgery. Eight healthy adult pigs underwent total robotic-assisted abdominal aortic replacement using the domestic MedBot® robotic system (KD-SR-2000 and JinFeng platforms). Perioperative monitoring included heart rate, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, and core temperature. Surgical parameters such as operative time, blood loss, and tissue integrity were also assessed. All eight procedures were completed successfully without conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. The median operative time was 129 min (IQR: 122–132), with dissection, exposure, and cross-clamping times of 41 min (IQR: 39–43), 34.2 min (IQR: 32–35), and 68 min (IQR: 66–72), respectively. Anastomosis times for the anterior and posterior aortic walls were 10.5 min (IQR: 9–11) and 15 min (IQR: 14–16), with no leaks observed. The median number of stitches was 27 (IQR: 26–28), and time per stitch was less than 90 s. Estimated blood loss was 59.5 mL (IQR: 48–63), and bleeding after clamp release was 20 mL (IQR: 15–22). Vital signs remained stable intraoperatively, and postmortem examination revealed no bleeding, leakage, or organ injury. RAAAR demonstrated technical feasibility and procedural safety in a large animal model. These findings provide experimental support for the future clinical application of robotic-assisted aortic surgery in human AAA treatment.

Indexed as

Aorta, AbdominalBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationRobotic Surgical ProceduresAnimalsBlood Loss, SurgicalFeasibility StudiesFemaleModels, AnimalOperative TimeSwineAortic replacementClinical researchPorcine modelRobotic surgeryVascular surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.