ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessing the environmental costs of multi-scale recurrent neural networks for sustainable extreme rainfall nowcasting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The nowcasting of extreme rainfall poses significant daily challenges on a global scale, especially in vulnerable regions of the Global South. Conventional Numerical Weather Prediction models often fail to deliver accurate and timely forecasts for extreme weather events, exacerbating socioeconomic inequalities and increasing climate vulnerability. Deep learning approaches present a promising opportunity to uncover more precise predictive patterns; however, their application remains constrained by the high computational costs associated to their large parameter spaces. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the MS-RNN framework for improving computational efficiency and predictive accuracy in extreme precipitation nowcasting, using real weather radar data from the TAASRAD19 and Rio de Janeiro datasets. While the framework has been extensively validated both theoretically and experimentally in other scenarios, this work examines its application to real radar data. Metrics related to sustainability, such as energy consumption, [Formula: see text] emissions, and water usage, have not been calculated in this specific context and are rarely addressed in current literature. Our findings demonstrate the potential of the solution to enhance computational efficiency maintaining predictive performance when applied to real weather radar data, supporting sustainable and accessible AI solutions for climate resilience in resource-limited regions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.