ArticleCommunications medicine2026
An interpretable machine learning model for predicting prognosis of medulloblastoma integrating genetic and clinical features.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting prognosis of medulloblastoma integrating genetic and clinical features.Communications medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedulloblastoma (MB), the most common malignant pediatric brain tumor, lacks prognostic tools integrating clinical, molecular, and treatment-related characteristics for individualized management.
methodsWe developed machine learning models using multicenter data from 729 Chinese patients (2001-2023), of whom 509 were assigned to the training set and 220 to the testing set, and further validated the models on 201 patients from international MB consortia. To accommodate patients and researchers with varying datatypes, four application scenarios were established, including clinical-molecular-radiotherapy (CMR), clinical-molecular (CM), clinical-radiotherapy (CR), and clinical-only (CO).
resultsWe construct four model scenarios and assess their predictive performance in the testing set: an XGBoost-based CMR model (incorporating 11 features, including molecular subgroup, radiotherapy dose, and key gene expression) with a C-index of 0.612; an XGBoost-based CM (C-index = 0.609); a GBM-based CR (C-index = 0.637); and a GBM-based CO (C-index = 0.635). External validation demonstrates robust performance, with radiotherapy and molecular data contributing significantly to enhanced efficacy. In addition, interactive web-based Shiny applications have been launched to facilitate dynamic risk assessment and treatment optimization.
conclusionsBy integrating multidimensional data, our framework enables the tailored prognostication and clinical decision to meet the multidimensional requirements of research and medicine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.