ArticleScientific reports2026
ResNet based backbone integrated YOLO framework for bone fracture detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The usage of artificial intelligence and machine learning has significantly strengthened computer-aided medical diagnostics, and fine-tuning models and architectures for medical detection purposes has become a common occurrence. Bone fracture detection is one of the applications where accurate localization of fractures is crucial for proper treatment. In this study, we propose a hybrid ResYOLO11 architecture that combines ResNet50's feature extraction capability and YOLO11's detection efficiency in a single model. The proposed architecture uses ResNet layers in the backbone and YOLO11 modules like C3K2, SPPF, and C2PSA to enhance the spatial feature representation, improve the classification precision and detection robustness. The architecture model was trained and evaluated on the public dataset of GRAZPEDWRI-DX, using precision, recall, mAP@50, and mAP@50-95 as performance metrics. The ResYOLO11 architecture achieved precision scores of 0.935, 0.944, 0.945, 0.956, and 0.963, and mAP@50 scores of 0.970, 0.974, 0.977, 0.982, and 0.986 across the nano, small, medium, large, and extra-large variants of the model, respectively. The inference time is 0.012, 0.014, 0.016, 0.019, and 0.026 seconds, respectively, for each model. Quantitative analysis show that ResYOLO11 achieved up to 4.2% higher mAP50 and 6.1% higher mAP50-95 compared to standard YOLO11 variants and was 24% faster in detecting fractures. This comparison showcases the architecture's potential for assisting orthopedic specialists in accurately identifying fractures and supporting clinical decision-making by providing a clinically robust and computationally efficient solution for computer-aided fracture diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.