ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026
Advances in the management of metastatic gastric cancer: current strategies and emerging therapeutics.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zanidatamab vs trastuzumab with or without PD-1 blockade in HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer: a reconstructed patient-level pooled analysis.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Lenvatinib enhances the response of biliary tract cancer to anti-HER2 therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic gastric cancer remains a major global health challenge with poor long-term outcomes. Over the past 5 years, the treatment landscape has rapidly evolved with the integration of biomarker-informed strategies that guide the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies in molecularly defined subgroups, including microsatellite unstable, PD-L1-expressing, HER2-positive and claudin 18.2-positive disease. Standard first-line treatment continues to rely on fluoropyrimidine-platinum chemotherapy backbones, with biomarker-driven agents selectively layered on for improved efficacy. Despite these advances, most patients continue to have disease progression, and durable responses are uncommon. In addition to identifying and validating new targets such as FGFR2b, ongoing efforts are focusing on novel strategies involving established targets, including HER2 and claudin 18.2, using next-generation treatment modalities such as antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies and cellular therapies. Complementary platforms including circulating tumour DNA and theranostic agents are also being explored to better guide treatment selection, facilitate non-invasive monitoring and enable early response assessments. In this Review, we summarize the current standard of care for patients with metastatic gastric cancer and also highlight emerging approaches aimed at improving the outcomes in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41807638What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.