Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807595›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A real-world retrospective analysis comparing the effectiveness of Azvudine and Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in COVID-19 patients with diabetes.

Zefeng Zhu, Qiqin Chen, Zichen Wang, Qijin Chen, Xialing Li, Yeying Liu, Haiqing Lu, Junyi Feng, Minhui Xie, Xiaomin Dong and 9 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Zefeng Zhu *Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, No.15, Lequn Road, Xiufeng District, Guilin, Guangxi Province, China. 6382851@qq.com.
Qiqin Chen *Department of Pharmacy, Sixth People's Hospital of Nanning, Nanning, China.
Zichen Wang *College of Pharmacy, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.
Qijin Chen *Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xialing Li *Department of Pharmacy, The First People's Hospital of Hechi, Hechi, China.
Yeying LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, China.
Haiqing LuDepartment of Pharmacy, Liuzhou People's Hospital, Liuzhou, China.
Junyi FengClinical Trial Institution Office, Wuxi Huishan District People's Hospital, Wuxi, China.
Minhui XieDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.
Xiaomin DongDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, No.15, Lequn Road, Xiufeng District, Guilin, Guangxi Province, China.
Bo ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, No.15, Lequn Road, Xiufeng District, Guilin, Guangxi Province, China.
Jingqing HuangDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, No.15, Lequn Road, Xiufeng District, Guilin, Guangxi Province, China.
Xian ZengDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, No.15, Lequn Road, Xiufeng District, Guilin, Guangxi Province, China.
Zheng ZengDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, No.15, Lequn Road, Xiufeng District, Guilin, Guangxi Province, China.
Yan YuanDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, No.15, Lequn Road, Xiufeng District, Guilin, Guangxi Province, China.
Feiyi XuCollege of Pharmacy, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.
Xueyu LiaoCollege of Pharmacy, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.
Bojia LiangCollege of Pharmacy, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, No.15, Lequn Road, Xiufeng District, Guilin, Guangxi Province, China. daicw1104@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Azvudine and Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir have been approved for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in adults at high risk for progression to severe disease. Diabetes is a high-risk complication of COVID-19. Currently, the effectiveness of Azvudine and Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in patients with both diabetes and COVID-19 remains unclear. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of these two drugs in patients with diabetes and COVID-19. In this retrospective study, data from 13,763 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with comorbid diabetes mellitus between December 5, 2022, and January 31, 2023, were analyzed. These patients were from six different hospitals in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, including 288 patients treated with Azvudine and 112 patients treated with Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir. The primary outcome comprised a composite endpoint of disease progression, characterized by all-cause mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Data were collected retrospectively through electronic medical record review, supplemented by telephone follow-up. We used propensity-score matching (PSM) to allow for a more direct comparison of the effectiveness between the two antiviral treatment groups. Among 400 enrolled patients, 41 deaths occurred during hospitalization or post-discharge follow-up (Azvudine group: n = 29; Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir group: n = 12). After propensity score matching (PSM), 17 deaths were recorded across both cohorts. Statistical analysis demonstrated no significant between-group differences in composite outcomes (including invasive mechanical ventilation and ICU admission). However, Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir showed a non-significant trend toward lower all-cause mortality (aHR = 0.502, 95% CI: 0.133–1.180) for all-cause mortality reduction versus Azvudine (Crude HR = 0.502; Adjusted HR [aHR] = 0.502, 95% CI: 0.133–1.180). Glucocorticoid use during therapy was associated with reduced mortality risk, while concomitant anticoagulant therapy increased composite outcome risk. Findings indicated a progressive elevation in mortality risk with advancing diabetes severity grade. Notably, Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.37 (95% CI: 0.11–1.00), corresponding to a 63% point-estimate reduction in mortality risk. In severe diabetes patients (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.11–1.00), although this result did not reach statistical significance. Regarding outcome measures, patients with diabetes and COVID-19 infection treated with Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir demonstrated a lower incidence of myocardial injury and a non-significant trend toward reduced mortality, but no significant difference in the composite endpoint. compared to those treated with Azvudine.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDiabetes MellitusRitonavirAgedChinaDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsDrug CombinationsRitonavirAzvudineCOVID-19Diabetes mellitusNirmatrelvir/RitonavirReal-world study

Identifiers

PMID41807595
PMCPMC12988051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.