Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807590›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Drug disposition study on a levofloxacin dry powder formulation using the isolated perfused lung in rats.

Maryam Dibaei, Mahdi Gholami, Hoda Lavasani, Behjat Sheikholesalmi, Tayebeh Toliyat, Ahmadreza Barazesh, Mahmoud Ghazi-Khansari, Katayoon Mireskandari, Mohammadreza Rouini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maryam DibaeiBiopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetic Division, Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdi GholamiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hoda LavasaniBiopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetic Division, Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Behjat SheikholesalmiBiopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetic Division, Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tayebeh ToliyatDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 14155-6451, Iran. toliyat@tums.ac.ir.
Ahmadreza BarazeshDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 14155-6451, Iran.
Mahmoud Ghazi-KhansariDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Katayoon MireskandariDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 14155-6451, Iran.
Mohammadreza RouiniBiopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetic Division, Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. rouini@tums.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, using an artificially perfused and mechanically ventilated lung as an experimental model, levofloxacin disposition after bolus and pulmonary delivery has been compared. This model was used to investigate the absorption of levofloxacin through the airway into the blood. Krebs-Ringer buffer medium containing bovine serum albumin was perfused into the lungs at a rate of 4 ml.min− 1. The lungs were ventilated with humidified air heated to 37 °C at 60 breaths per minute. Levofloxacin was administered into the perfusion circuit as a bolus injection and into inhalation air (dry powder). By using HPLC combined with UV detection, the concentration of levofloxacin (in efferent) was determined after lung perfusion. Levofloxacin transported from lung to blood and was detectable within an hour of the experiment, although due to rapid elimination it was no longer detectable 20 min after bolus administration. The normalized AUC0−inf. after administration of dry powder and solution were 34209.17 ± 6446.1 and 329371.02 ± 94627.7 ng.min.ml− 1.mg− 1, respectively. At the end of the experiment, higher levels of levofloxacin were detected in the lungs via pulmonary administration. This ex vivo model resulted in localized delivery of levofloxacin to the lung compartment and measurable transfer into the perfusate.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsLevofloxacinLungAdministration, InhalationAnimalsMalePerfusionPowdersRatsAnti-Bacterial AgentsLevofloxacinPowdersDispositionDry powderIsolated perfused lungLevofloxacinPulmonary delivery

Identifiers

PMID41807590
PMCPMC13096449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.