ArticleScientific reports2026
Reliability of contactless vital sign measurement algorithms for use in drone-based mass casualty triage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In mass casualty incidents, the demand for healthcare services far exceeds existing capacity, underscoring the importance of triage. This study supports drone-based triage by developing and validating algorithms for non-contact vital sign measurement from drone footage. Heart rate was measured by extracting average frame colour values from RGB videos and applying signal processing. Respiratory rate was obtained by analyzing temperature changes in the nasal region. Body temperature was analyzed based on the maximum temperature values in the forehead region’ thermal images. For oxygen saturation measurement, a deep learning model trained with features extracted from thermal images. Thirty-seven participants (mean age: 29.7 ± 8.45 years; 64.9% male) were simultaneously recorded using a drone-mounted camera and monitored with a standard bedside reference monitor, with seven recordings obtained outdoors and 30 indoors. The videos were analyzed by creating 15-second segments for respiratory rate and 13-second segments for the other parameters, with 1-second shifts. The accuracy rates of the oxygen saturation, body temperature, heart rate, and respiratory rate measurement algorithms were 98.65%, 98.59%, 97.70%, and 85.22%, respectively, for indoor recordings, and 99.60%, 98.48%, 96.85%, and 82.83% for outdoor recordings. The mean differences between the image processing–based and reference measurements for indoor recordings were 1.26% for oxygen saturation, 0.19 °C for body temperature, -0.37 breaths/min for respiratory rate, and −0.31 beats/min for heart rate; for outdoor recordings, the corresponding mean differences were 0.34%, 0.27 °C, −0.52 breaths/min, and −0.38 beats/min, respectively. The vital sign measurement algorithms demonstrated strong performance and can be successfully integrated into drone-based triage and other remote monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.