ArticleScientific reports2026
Green space suitability assessment for sustainable urban development using geospatial technology in Eka Tafo, Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban green spaces offer several economic, social, and health benefits to residents. This study was conducted to identify the appropriate locations of green spaces in the Eka Tafo Sub-City using geospatial technologies, namely Geographic Information System (GIS) and Remote Sensing (RS). Eight parameters were evaluated: slope, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), proximity to rivers, elevation, land use, soil type, proximity to highways, and population density. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to assign weights to each factor. The green space suitability map was generated by integrating all the thematic layers in ArcGIS. The green space map identifies five suitability zones: highly suitable, suitable, moderately suitable, poorly suitable, and unsuitable. The findings showed that approximately 30.7% of the study area was classified as suitable to highly suitable for green space, whereas 40.7% was considered unsuitable to poorly suitable. These results enable policymakers to determine the open green spaces that enhance the environmental quality of urban areas and the living standards of residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.