Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807572›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Efficacy of a novel bacteriophage in controlling Escherichia coli associated with swine farm environments and its potential for biofilm disruption.

Phitchayapak Wintachai, Renuka Thonguppatham, Duncan R Smith, Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai, Sutthirat Sitthisak, Ratchadaporn Boripun, Komwit Surachat, Martha R J Clokie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Phitchayapak WintachaiBacteriophage Laboratory, Walailak University, Thasala, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand. sanwinta@gmail.com.
Renuka ThonguppathamBacteriophage Laboratory, Walailak University, Thasala, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand.
Duncan R SmithInstitute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Supayang Piyawan VoravuthikunchaiCenter of Antimicrobial Biomaterial Innovation-Southeast Asia and Natural Product Research Center of Excellence, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Sutthirat SitthisakCenter of Excellence in Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Medical Science, Naresuan University, Muang, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Ratchadaporn BoripunAkkhraratchakumari Veterinary College, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand.
Komwit SurachatDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Martha R J ClokieBecky Meyer Centre for Phage Research, Department of Genetics, Genomics, and Cancer Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) and Walailak University N42A670603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli infections in swine farms, reported globally, including in Thailand, causes symptoms ranging from mild to severe and leads to economic losses. Numerous studies have demonstrated a correlation between antibiotic use and the development of antibiotic resistance, highlighting the risk associated with antibiotic misuse and overuse. However, no practical alternative for E. coli infection in swine and their environments has been established. In this study, an Escherichia phage specific to MDR E. coli, named phage vB_EcoM_PPW9 (phage vECPPW9), was isolated and characterized. The antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of the phage were evaluated. This phage formed small plaques with halos, and transmission electron microscopy revealed that it possessed an icosahedral head and a contractile tail. Phage vECPPW9 lysed 40% of the tested E. coli isolates and exhibited high adsorption efficacy, a short latent period, large burst size, and moderate stability across various temperatures and pH levels. Even at low multiplicity of infection, the phage demonstrated strong lytic activity, confirmed by observations of bacterial morphology under a scanning electron microscope. Genomic analysis revealed that phage vECPPW9 had a linear double-stranded DNA genome of 152,457 base pairs, comprising 284 predicted coding sequences and 13 tRNA genes, and lacked genes associated with virulence or antibiotic resistance. Phylogenetic analysis classified phage vECPPW9 as a novel member of the Phapecoctavirus genus within the Stephanstirmvirinae subfamily. Additionally, phage vECPPW9 exhibited strong antibiofilm activity by inhibiting biofilm formation and reducing established biofilms, as demonstrated by biofilm biomass measurements and bacterial cell viability counting. This antibiofilm effect was also observed on both rubber tube and stainless steel surfaces. Given the urgent need for antibiotic stewardship and alternative antimicrobial strategies, phage vECPPW9 represents a promising candidate for controlling MDR E. coli infections in swine farming.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesBiofilmsColiphagesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsSwine DiseasesAnimalsFarmsSwineAntibacterial activityBacteriophageBiofilmsEscherichia coliPhage therapy

Identifiers

PMID41807572
PMCPMC13096147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.