Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41807571›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Diagnostic uncertainty of clinical T2 disease and its impact on treatment stratification in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.

Masanobu Shiga, Shuya Kandori, Shingo Hatakeyama, Naoki Fujita, Mizuki Kobayashi, Daiki Ikarashi, Hiroki Fukuhara, Takuma Sato, Shingo Myoen, Motohide Uemura and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Masanobu ShigaDepartment of Urology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
Shuya KandoriDepartment of Urology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan. shuya79@md.tsukuba.ac.jp.
Shingo HatakeyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Naoki FujitaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Mizuki KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Daiki IkarashiDepartment of Urology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Hiroki FukuharaDepartment of Urology, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Takuma SatoDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Shingo MyoenDepartment of Urology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan.
Motohide UemuraDivision of Urology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Takamitsu InoueDepartment of Renal and Urological Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan.
Masaaki OikawaDivision of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan.
Yasuhiro KaihoDivision of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan.
Jun MiyazakiDepartment of Renal and Urological Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan.
Yoshiyuki KojimaDivision of Urology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Hisanobu AdachiDepartment of Urology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan.
Akihiro ItoDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Norihiko TsuchiyaDepartment of Urology, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Wataru ObaraDepartment of Urology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Tomonori HabuchiDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Chikara OhyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hiroyuki NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K24469Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25K20057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate clinical staging of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains challenging, and discrepancies between clinical and pathological T stages may result in missed opportunities for appropriate treatment. This study aimed to elucidate real-world discrepancies between clinical and pathological T staging in UTUC, emphasizing the diagnostic uncertainty associated with clinical T2 (cT2) disease. A retrospective analysis was conducted involving 739 patients with cTa–4N0M0 UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) at multiple institutions. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy or had missing pathological T stage data were excluded. Discrepancies between clinical and pathological staging, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes were evaluated. Among 739 patients, substantial discrepancies between clinical and pathological T stages were observed, with an overall diagnostic concordance rate of 44.7%. Only 16% of cT2 cases were pathologically confirmed as pathological T2 (pT2), whereas most were either down-staged to ≤pT1 or up-staged to ≥pT3, indicating marked diagnostic uncertainty. Clinical heterogeneity within the cT2 group resulted in marked survival differences based on pathological stage, as pT3 patients had significantly worse outcomes than pT2 patients. Within the pT3 subgroup, lymphovascular invasion independently correlated with poor prognosis, whereas adjuvant therapy improved survival. However, only approximately one-third of patients with pT3 disease received adjuvant therapy, indicating a treatment gap in this high-risk population. This multicenter study identified real-world discrepancies between clinical and pathological staging in UTUC. cT2 disease represents a heterogeneous and diagnostically uncertain category, requiring careful interpretation for appropriate treatment planning.

Indexed as

Urologic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNephroureterectomyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRadical nephroureterectomyStage discrepancyUpper urinary tractUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41807571
PMCPMC13096306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.