ArticleScientific reports2026
Noradrenergic activity as a key target in modulating consciousness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How the brain generates conscious experiences remains profoundly mysterious. Pharmacological interventions that alter the state of consciousness have been proposed as a tool to investigate the neural mechanisms of consciousness. However, we have recently demonstrated that the sedative Propofol influences both conscious and unconscious neural processing. Altered arousal, and other pharmacological effects, therefore cannot be assumed a priori to provide information specifically on conscious neural processes. Instead, effects on both conscious and unconscious processes need to be considered. Here we investigated the role of noradrenergic activity in conscious and unconscious visuospatial processing. In Study 1 we used Dexmedetomidine, a sedative that specifically targets α2A noradrenergic receptors. In Study 2, we used sleep deprivation as a natural state of altered arousal, which exerts partially overlapping effects on noradrenaline levels. Unlike Propofol, both Dexmedetomidine and sleep deprivation selectively altered brain activity (fMRI BOLD signal change) during conscious processing. However, the two methods produced distinct effects on visuospatial bias during low arousal: while Dexmedetomidine reduced leftward bias, sleep deprivation increased leftward bias. These differential effects on spatial bias were explained by an unexpected increase in sympathetic drive, as indexed by increased activity in the central autonomic network and in heart rate, from sleep deprivation, that indicate increased rather than decreased noradrenaline levels during task performance. Together, these findings emphasize noradrenergic activity as a target for pharmacological manipulations of consciousness, which could open a window to its neurophysiological underpinnings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.