ArticleScientific reports2026
Interpretable predictive model for listed companies ESG greenwashing based on XGBoost and SHAP.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prediction of ESG greenwashing among listed companies is crucial for ex-ante control of deceptive ESG information disclosures by companies and for early warning of ESG investment risks. Machine learning techniques are commonly used to predict corporate behavior, but their application in ESG greenwashing is limited and lacks interpretability. This study proposes a predictive model for ESG greenwashing in listed companies using the enhanced XGBoost algorithm and SHAP interpretation method. Using a dataset of Chinese listed companies from 2009 to 2022, this study selects 16 indicators of corporate and external pressure characteristics as the model's input variables, combines five-fold cross-validation and grid search parameter tuning, and constructs two company ESG greenwashing prediction models. The prediction performance is compared with Random Forest, SVM, LightGBM, BP neural network, and three XGBoost methods. The SHAP method is used to explain the contribution of the main indicators in predicting the company's ESG greenwashing. The results show that the one-period-lagged corporate characteristics model achieves 86.82% prediction accuracy, and corporate financial characteristics have a greater impact on prediction results than corporate governance characteristics. Further analysis shows that the one-period-lagged corporate characteristics model performs better in non-heavy-pollution industries and state-owned enterprises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.